Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] inputs on IPv4 Inter-RIR policy proposals - AFRINIC needs this policy now!

JORDI PALET MARTINEZ jordi.palet at consulintel.es
Mon Jun 17 13:31:58 UTC 2019


Hi Omo,

 

There is no way that a RIR can control 100% of the resources escaping from the region if there is not an inter-RIR policy.

 

Please, remember that initially I was personally *against* any kind of transfer policies, but facts and reality changed my view of the situation.

 

I think we need to be smart and have *control* on the transfers instead of negate the fact that they will not occur not having a policy. 

 

As the Inter-RIR transfers have been working *very well* for several years now in ARIN, RIPE and APNIC, I don’t think those communities will agree to change their mind to allow transfers with non-reciprocal policies. What is the benefit for them?

 

Please, wait for my presentation and you will see that those concerns aren’t something real anymore.

 

Note that LACNIC had the same concern, and it was attemted in 3 different one-way proposals, from different authors. All them failed for *several* years. About 8 months ago I’ve proposed something similar to the proposals that I’ve done for AFRINIC and in the last meeting (1 month ago), *both* policy proposals reached consensus. Now, it will require several months to implement them.

 

Regards,

Jordi

@jordipalet

 

 

 

El 17/6/19 12:09, "Omo Oaiya" <Omo.Oaiya at wacren.net> escribió:

 

 



On 16 Jun 2019, at 19:14, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD <rpd at afrinic.net> wrote:

 

Thanks Mark,

Short explanation about why I submitted two policy proposals for the same problem:

1) I know some folks in the region (it happened as well in other regions), are afraid of IPv4 addresses scaping "out" of the region with this kind of policy proposal.

2) In my presentation I will try to demonstrate, and hopefully convince the participants, that this is not the case and that this policy proposal is clearly beneficial (and needed) for the region.

So, as you say, 2019-v4-001-d1, may be a possible interim if I'm not good enough selling my arguments.

 

 

Jordi,

 

#1 is a real concern.   AFRINIC cannot afford to have the meagre IPv4 addresses its has available in comparison to other RIRs going out of the region, legacy or not.   

 

I cannot support this and would only consider a one way transfer into AFRINIC.   I would encourage you to propose policies along this line - here or/and in other RIRs so any reciprocity rules that prohibit such policies are rescinded.

 

Omo

 

 






**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20190617/08996e7b/attachment.html>


More information about the RPD mailing list