Search RPD Archives
[rpd] RPD : Prolicy proposal "Internet Number Resources review by AFRINIC" informations update
Omo.Oaiya at wacren.net
Wed May 15 07:24:05 UTC 2019
> On 14 May 2019, at 20:26, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
>> On 14 May 2019, at 09:34, Marcus K. G. Adomey <madomey at hotmail.com> wrote:
>> The whole point of the review is to determine compliance which means usage of INR and there is no way INR which have been determined to be in usage by legitimate users through the said review would be revoked to cause denial of service to end users. There is just no way.
> Sure there is… Poor record keeping… The resources may well be in valid use, but the ISP in question fails to properly account for that use during a review and the resources are, therefore reclaimed.
> Point to the section of your proposal where that is prevented?
I see this section of the proposal that caters adequately for this. I note that in all cases opportunity is given to rectify issues except if there’s fraud
13.4 In case of non-compliance and if evidence has been established in accordance with:
• Breach of AFRINIC policies
• Breach of the provisions of the registration service agreement or other legal agreements between the organization holding the resource and AFRINIC.
AFRNIC shall initiate the resource recovery process.
A) AFRINIC shall attempt to contact the organization and correct any discrepancy towards the RSA. Except in cases of fraudulent resource acquisition or unlawful usage and abuse, the organization shall be given a minimum of six months to effect the return of the resources.
If the organization is cooperative and working in good faith to substantially restore compliance or has a valid need for additional time to renumber out of the affected blocks, AFRINIC shall negotiate a longer term. The acceptance level of compliance and duration of the longer term are at AFRINIC staff discretion.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the RPD