[rpd] Proposal: Clarification on temporary resource usage

[Andrew Alston]

Willy,

Heh – at the speed the IETF works – if you wait for formal RFC’s these days – you’ll be waiting a hell of a long time.

TACACS – which has been around for 20+ years – is a draft
Segment routing – which is being more and more used – is a draft
Segment routing BGP extensions – is a draft

It’s a long long list of very much production technologies

The draft tag – doesn’t mean much these days

Andrew


From: Willy Manga <mangawilly at gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, 14 April 2019 23:51
To: rpd at afrinic.net
Subject: Re: [rpd] Proposal: Clarification on temporary resource usage

Hi Jordi,

On 21/12/2018 18:50, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD wrote:
> [...]
> You may want to add the following references (the first one will become, hopefully soon, an RFC):
> - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-transition-ipv4aas/<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-transition-ipv4aas/>
> - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-deployment/<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-deployment/>

I'd love to include them but right now they are still in the draft
section. It is better to mention documents elected as RFC in the CPM in
my humble opinion.

If they get approval before the end of the discussion on this proposal,
they will surely be included.

--
Willy Manga
@ongolaboy
https://ongola.blogspot.com/<https://ongola.blogspot.com/>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20190415/f92087e8/attachment.html>