[rpd] New Proposal: Pv6 PI Clarification

Thu Apr 11 13:20:49 UTC 2019

> On Apr 11, 2019, at 5:35 AM, Lee Howard <lee.howard at retevia.net> wrote:
> 
> 
> On 4/11/19 7:49 AM, Jaco Kroon wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Use of ULA compared to RFC1918 addresses?
> There is little or no consensus around how to use ULA addresses.

Indeed, there are many who believe ULA should not exist.

>> Not objecting.  Making IPv6 more freely available might just help with uptake, which we really need.
> 
> Among the reasons I have heard for delaying IPv6 deployment, I have never heard that IPv6 addresses were not freely available enough. Is it an issue for you or your organization?

While I agree that this is not an issue, I do think that there is a legitimate need to provide PI space not only for publicly announced networks, but also for the legitimate numbering of private networks that need GUA for a variety of legitimate reasons.

As such, while I don’t entirely buy into the problem statement, I do support the intent of the proposal.

Owen

> 
> Lee
> 
>> 
>> Kind Regards,
>> Jaco
>> 
>> 
>> On 2019/04/11 13:13, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ via RPD wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> I think the problem statement is very clear and the solution as well, but as usual, I'm happy to clarify and work out if anyone find any issues.
>>> 
>>> Thanks!
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Jordi
>>> 
>>> El 11/4/19 13:03, "Ernest Byaruhanga" <ernest at afrinic.net> escribió:
>>> 
>>>      A new proposal has been received as follows:
>>>           IPv6 PI Clarification:
>>>      https://afrinic.net/policy/2019-v6-d1#proposal
>>>           It removes conditions around the need to announce IPv6 PI space within 12 months of getting it, as required in CPM6.8.2
>>>                *Plain text version below* :
>>>                1.0 Summary of the problem being addressed by this proposal
>>>           By means of policy proposal “IPv6 PI Update” (AFPUB-2018-V6-004), the IPv6 Provider Independent (PI) space policy that provides IPv6 space for end-sites was revised/updated.
>>>      This revision however overlooked a sentence in the previous section 6.8.2.v, which read:
>>>      “The 'end-site' must show a plan to use and announce the IPv6 provider independent address space within twelve (12) months. After that period, if not announced, the assigned IPv6 PI address space should be reclaimed and returned to the free pool by AFRINIC”.
>>>      This text was retained under 6.8.2.iv.
>>>      Of course, this doesn’t make sense because there are several possible cases, which are in the scope of this policy, that will not announce their IPv6 PI address space, such as:
>>>      IXP’s LAN peering space.
>>>      In IPv6 there is no private address space equivalent to the IPv4 one as per RFC1918, so if an organization needs IPv6 space for numbering a network or a set of them, even if those aren’t connected today to the Internet, the RIR should be able to provide that space.
>>>            2.0 Summary of how this proposal addresses the problem
>>>           Simple rewording of the text to allow those cases that don’t need to announce their IPv6 PI space.
>>>           3.0 Proposal
>>>           .....................................
>>>      Proposed (New) CPM content:
>>>           6.8.2 Assignment Criteria
>>>      Assignment target - End-sites which provide services for a single administrative organisations' network, regardless of their size.
>>>      Assignment criteria:
>>>      i. The end-site must not be an LIR
>>>      ii. The end-site must become an AFRINIC End User Member and pay the normal AFRINIC fee for its membership category
>>>      iii. The end-site must justify the need for the IPv6 PI address space.
>>>      iv. The end-site must show a plan to use the IPv6 provider independent address space within twelve (12) months.
>>>      v. The IPv6 provider independent address space, if announced by the end-site should not be disaggregated.
>>>      .....................................
>>>           Current CPM content (to be replaced by the proposed text above)
>>>           6.8.2 Assignment Criteria
>>>      Assignment target - End-sites which provide Public Internet services for a single administrative organisations' network, regardless of their size.
>>>      Assignment criteria:
>>>      i. The end-site must not be an LIR
>>>      ii. The end-site must become an AFRINIC End User Member and pay the normal AFRINIC fee for its membership category
>>>      iii. The end-site must justify the need for the IPv6 PI address space.
>>>      iv. The end-site must show a plan to use the IPv6 provider independent address space within twelve (12) months. After that period, if not announced, the assigned IPv6 PI address space should be reclaimed and returned to the free pool by AFRINIC.
>>>      v. The IPv6 provider independent address space to be announced by the end-site should not be disaggregated.
>>>      .....................................
>>>                4. References
>>>           Other RIRs have already accommodated this requirement in their policies:
>>>      - APNIC: 10.1.4. Provider Independent IPv6 assignment
>>> https://www.apnic.net/community/policy/resources#Part%203:%20IPv6%20Policy
>>>      - ARIN: 6.5.8.1. Initial Assignment Criteria
>>> https://www.arin.net/participate/policy/nrpm/#6-5-8-direct-assignments-from-arin-to-end-user-organizations
>>>      - LACNIC: 4.5.4.2 Direct assignment of portable IPv6 addresses to End sites not having portable IPv4 addresses previously assigned by LACNIC
>>> https://www.lacnic.net/684/2/lacnic/4-ipv6-address-allocation-and-assignment-policies
>>>      - RIPE: IPv6 Provider Independent (PI) Assignments
>>> https://www.ripe.net/publications/docs/ripe-707#IPv6_PI_Assignments
>>>                --
>>>           (Sent on co-chairs behalf)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> **********************************************
>>> IPv4 is over
>>> Are you ready for the new Internet ?
>>> http://www.theipv6company.com
>>> The IPv6 Company
>>> 
>>> This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> RPD mailing list
>>> RPD at afrinic.net
>>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> RPD mailing list
>> RPD at afrinic.net
>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd
> 
> _______________________________________________
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd