[rpd] New Policy Proposal Received - "Multihoming not required for ASN (AFPUB-2019-ASN-DRAFT01)" (staff assessment on v1)

[Sander Steffann]

Hi,

> Op 9 apr. 2019, om 15:18 heeft Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> het volgende geschreven:
> 
> Small suggested edit…
> 
> 7.4.2 should, IMHO, read as follows:
> 	7.4.2 Interconnection with one or more other ASNs which requires a globally unique ASN.
> 
> The reason for this change is as follows… A literal reading of the text as written has two defects.
> 
> 	1.	It could be interpreted to require interconnection to at least 2 peers.
> 	2.	The term unique could be stretched to include situations where a unique (within an administrative
> 		boundary) private ASN would be adequate or sufficient.

I agree with your suggested wording.

Cheers,
Sander

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20190409/b5177a8e/attachment.sig>