Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] Opposing the last call made on the review policy

Frank Habicht geier at
Sat Dec 1 13:34:38 UTC 2018

On 01/12/2018 12:32, Timothy Ola Akinfenwa wrote:
> Hi Frank,
> You are right, the RSA mentioned the possibility of a review of 
> allocated resources which the proposal also took into consideration 
> especially as contained in 4.(b).
> However, to my understanding, the RSA does not explicitly provide or 
> explain how the review should be done, including but not limited to an 
> appeal process in case of unjustly recovered resources, which the 
> proposal is trying to address.
> Ti</>

In my opinion all of this which is not defined in RSA and in the Policy 
Manual will go back to staff decision and judgement, including CEO.
And if there is any doubt or abuse or bias or threats, these can be 
referred to the board.

This is How it is (in my opinion) before this proposed policy.

And this is how it should stay, in my opinion.

the PDP is there to define how internet numbering resources are 
distributed, not if or how the use should then be monitored/audited.


More information about the RPD mailing list