Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] policy proposal - Clarification on IPv6 Sub-Assignments

JORDI PALET MARTINEZ jordi.palet at consulintel.es
Wed Aug 15 17:10:20 UTC 2018


Mmm ... maybe even simpler:

"Non-permanently provisioning an address or prefix to a third party device, for use on a network managed and operated by the assignment holder, shall not be considered a sub-assignment. The provision of addresses for (semi-)permanent connectivity like ISP and broadband services is still considered a sub-assignment, with the exception of point-to-point links."

Regards,
Jordi
 
 

-----Mensaje original-----
De: Sander Steffann <sander at steffann.nl>
Fecha: miércoles, 15 de agosto de 2018, 11:55
Para: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <jordi.palet at consulintel.es>
CC: <rpd at afrinic.net>
Asunto: Re: [rpd] policy proposal - Clarification on IPv6 Sub-Assignments

    Hi Jordi,
    
    > The point here is that this is for end-users, not LIRs ...
    
    Sorry, my bad. I meant end-user. The same arguments apply.
    
    > Note that all the examples you mention are non-temporary.
    
    Indeed, but they are still needed in operational reality. That was my point :)
    
    > The problem of "managing" is that if I'm a university student, I'm managing my computer.
    
    That's totally fine, as long as you aren't managing the network you connect to. Assignment should go with who manages the network, independent of who manages the device.
    
    > [...]
    > 
    > Trying to follow your idea, may be something like:
    > 
    > The fact that is non-permanently provided to third parties while still managed by the AfriNIC end-user, shall not be considered a sub-assignment. The provision of addressing for permanent connectivity or broadband services is still considered a sub-assignment, with the exception of point-to-point links
    
    Not good enough. The server I host for my business partner needs a stable address for example.
    
    How about:
    
    "Providing one or more separate addresses to third party devices for use on a network managed and operated by the assignment holder and temporarily provided address space to third parties shall not be considered a sub-assignment. The provision of addresses for (semi-)permanent connectivity like ISP and broadband services is still considered a sub-assignment, with the exception of point-to-point links."
    
    Cheers,
    Sander
    
    



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.consulintel.es
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.






More information about the RPD mailing list