Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] policy proposal - Clarification on IPv6 Sub-Assignments

JORDI PALET MARTINEZ jordi.palet at consulintel.es
Mon Aug 13 18:18:10 UTC 2018


Hi all,



In the last meeting, we discussed about this policy proposal:



https://www.afrinic.net/en/community/policy-development/policy-proposals/2321-clarification-on-ipv6-sub-assignments



This problem is basically the same in all the 5 RIRs and I proposed the same text to all.



The problem is only for end-users (in IPv4 doesn't happen because we use NAT) which aren't allowed to provide addresses (for the connection to Internet) to third parties, in a few examples:

1) You're a university and you provide addresses to students

2) You're a company and provide addresses for the employees

3) You're a small hot-spot provider and of course, you want to have customers on it



In some RIRs, the proposal text has been simplified. So, I will like to know opinions for if needed, sending a new version.



I see two choices:

Option 1)

The fact that is non-permanently provided to third parties shall not be considered a sub-assignment. The provision of addressing for permanent connectivity or broadband services is still considered a sub-assignment, with the exception of point-to-point links.



Option 2)

The fact that a unique address or even a unique /64 prefix is non-permanently provided to third parties, shall not be considered a sub-assignment. The provision of addressing for permanent connectivity or broadband services is still considered a sub-assignment, with the exception of point-to-point links.



Option 1 will allow any number of address, option 2 will allow only up to /64. In both cases only for temporary usage.



What are your opinions?



Thanks!



Regards,

Jordi

 




**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.consulintel.es
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.






More information about the RPD mailing list