Search RPD Archives
[rpd] PDP-BIS Follow-up
sm+afrinic at elandsys.com
Tue Apr 10 20:06:51 UTC 2018
I read AFPUB-2017-GEN-002-DRAFT-02. In Section 3.5:
"One or all initiators of a policy proposal have the option to
Could the anonymity cause any conflict of interest issues?
In Section 126.96.36.199:
"Once adopted by the working group, the initiator(s) grants all rights to
the working group and the proposal becomes a community document. In all
matters of intellectual property rights and procedures."
Does that mean that the author does not have any IPR on the work?
Is the working group allowed to act as a "copyright owner"?
In Section 3.6:
"After a draft proposal has reached rough consensus, the AFRINIC
board of Directors have the obligation to check if process has
been followed very well."
Section 188.8.131.52 (a) uses the term "consensus" while 184.108.40.206 (c) uses
the term "rough consensus". Can a draft proposal can be ratified by
the Board if it has reached "rough consensus" only?
Does Section 3.6 mean that the Board of directors should perform a
detailed verification of the process which was followed for the draft proposal?
Is the "will endorse any such adopted policy" sentence in Section
3.7.2. in conflict with Section 11.5 (ii) of the Bylaws?
More information about the RPD