Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] New Policy Proposal Received - “IPv6 Policy and References Update (AFPUB-2018-V6-001-DRAFT01)"

JORDI PALET MARTINEZ jordi.palet at consulintel.es
Fri Mar 16 12:55:24 UTC 2018


Hi Fabian,

 

Thanks for your input.

 

I’m trying to understand what you mean and if it is different than what I’m proposing.

 

My proposed text is:

“In IPv6,"utilisation" is only measured in terms of the number of prefixes assigned to End Sites, not their size or the number of addresses actually used in those prefixes”

 

In IPv6 and end-site can have a /48 and only use at the moment, let’s say, for example, half of it (in terms of number of /64).

 

Utilization (from my understanding and also what is in the other RIR policies), is the full /48, because from the ISP perspective, this is already “on the hands” of a customer, and the ISP can’t take advantage of it anymore (unless the customer goes to another ISP).

 

In fact, my text is the same as the actual policy text in the meaning. Just simplified “how” to say it.

 

May be you can tell an example of what you mean?


Regards,

Jordi

 

De: Fabian Jr <afabbie at hotmail.com>
Fecha: viernes, 16 de marzo de 2018, 13:49
Para: Dewole Ajao <dewole at forum.org.ng>, rpd <rpd at afrinic.net>
Asunto: Re: [rpd] New Policy Proposal Received - “IPv6 Policy and References Update (AFPUB-2018-V6-001-DRAFT01)"

 

i have read the document ...it looks ok...

 

i have one comment on section 6.1 

 

i would recommend Utilization to be measured by number of prefixes assigned to End Sites which already have any Whole Prefix or Partial Prefix(es) in actual use. This is because from a general understanding and practice on IP/IPs Utilization ...has been counted on the actual IP assigned to devices and online/in use.

 

regards,

 

 


Arbogast Fabian,
cell:+255-78-447-8387

 

From: Dewole Ajao <dewole at forum.org.ng>
Sent: Friday, March 16, 2018 12:51 AM
To: rpd
Subject: [rpd] New Policy Proposal Received - “IPv6 Policy and References Update (AFPUB-2018-V6-001-DRAFT01)" 

 

Good day AFRINIC PDWG Members,

We have received a new policy proposal as follows.

Proposal: IPv6 Policy and References Update
ID: AFPUB-2018-V6-001-DRAFT01
Author: Jordi Palet Martinez | jordi.palet[at]theipv6company.com  

The proposal contents are published at https://www.afrinic.net/en/community/policy-development/policy-proposals/2313-ipv6-policy-and-references-update

Please take some time to go through the proposal contents and provide your feedback.

Thank you.

PDWG Co-chairs

_______________________________________________
RPD mailing list
RPD at afrinic.net
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd

_______________________________________________ RPD mailing list RPD at afrinic.net https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/rpd 



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.consulintel.es
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20180316/c9b709d7/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the RPD mailing list