Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] IPv4 Soft Landing BIS

Owen DeLong owen at
Fri Jul 28 17:55:09 UTC 2017

> On Jul 27, 2017, at 14:53 , ALI Hadji Mmadi <alihadji90 at> wrote:
> Hi Owen, 
> >>...Which is a bad-faith mutation of what was agreed in public during the PDWG meeting in Mauritius.
> Let me ask you to avoid such remarks when divergenses of ideas emerge.

I don’t make that remark because the ideas have diverged. I make the remark because an agreement was made and then reneged. That is the very definition of bad faith.

Some examples of bad faith include: a company representative who negotiates with union workers while having no intent of compromising;[4] <> a prosecutor who argues a legal position that he knows to be false;[5] <> an insurer who uses language and reasoning which are deliberately misleading in order to deny a claim.[5] <>

> On the other hand, it is also said somewhere that: If someone speaks a great deal at the moment when one wants to reach a conclusion that is mean this boy is not in agreement with what he is saying and what he thinks.

I have to admit that I’m having trouble parsing that. Perhaps it is translated from some other language.

> In Mauritius no one has forced anyone to withdraw or maintain his proposal. If those who have withdrawn his proposal that is done with a good-faith, so keep silent or simply help with the improvement of the draft on the list.

You don’t seem to understand the argument I am making here.

Both Andrew and Alain agreed to mutually withdraw their proposals.
Alain subsequently reneged on that agreement in bad faith. Andrew followed through on his part of the agreement even though Alain reneged on his part.

This is fact. It is documented in the video.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the RPD mailing list