Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] IPv4 Soft Landing BIS

Jackson Muthili jacksonmuthi at gmail.com
Mon Jul 24 18:33:45 UTC 2017


On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 9:13 PM, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
>
>> On Jul 24, 2017, at 03:37 , Jackson Muthili <jacksonmuthi at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 8:51 PM, Ish Sookun <ish at lsl.digital> wrote:
>>> Hi Omo, Joe and Alain,
>>>
>>> Section 5.4.3.1.1 of the IPv4 Soft Landing BIS [1] states the following:
>>>
>>>    "During this phase, allocation/assignment of IPv4 address space will
>>>     continue as in Pre-Exhaustion with the minimum set at /24, but the
>>>     maximum will change from /10 to /18, subject to the provisions in
>>>     5.4.6.
>>>
>>> The policy proposal was submitted on 29 June 2017. However, on 3 April
>>> 2017 AFRINIC announced [2] entering IPv4 Exhaustion Phase 1. Shouldn't
>>> the proposal state "Exhaustion Phase 1" as the "Current Phase" and
>>> therefore propose the maximum allocation change from /13 to /18?
>>
>>        This Soft Landing revision version 5 received support to fast
>> track it through the PDP.
>
> Um… WHere is this support recorded?

rpd archive

https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/2017/007145.html

https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/2017/007006.html

> From whom?

community members

> What, exactly, does “fast track”
> it through the PDP mean?

the CPM 3.6 article - Varying The Process

J



More information about the RPD mailing list