Search RPD Archives
[rpd] Last Call for "AFPUB-2016-GEN-001-DRAFT-04 - Internet Number Resources Review by AFRINIC"
ALI Hadji Mmadi
alihadji90 at gmail.com
Thu Jul 20 07:08:48 UTC 2017
I agree with you, and I think it is a message of wisdom and responsibility.
But, In the one of last public discussion of a policy, you said publicly if
there wis a consensus, you would advise the board not to ratify. Would that
be the case if today it was the case?
2017-07-19 8:28 GMT+03:00 Alan Barrett <alan.barrett at afrinic.net>:
> > On 18 Jul 2017, at 22:10, Arnaud AMELINA <amelnaud at gmail.com> wrote:
> > There is a full consensus on the list on the principle of review
> (including yourself).
> > What Is then expected from all participants in the PDP is to contribute
> to improve the proposal on the table to make it a consensual document.
> A policy proposal, to be accepted, must gain rough consensus on the detils
> of the proposal, not only on the principle.
> When a proposal fails to find rough consensus, then I believe that the
> onus is on the authors to produce a revised draft that addresses the
> objections, or to persuade the community as a whole that the objections are
> not valid or not important. Alternatively, the authors may withdraw the
> Objectors who want to be taken seriously should explain the reasons for
> their objections. There is no requirement for objectors to suggest
> alternative text to improve the proposal, although it is often very useful
> for objectors to do that. Authors can use these explanations, and proposed
> text changes if available, to assist them in producing a revised draft of
> the proposal.
> Alan Barrett
> RPD mailing list
> RPD at afrinic.net
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the RPD