Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] Report of the Soft Landing isuue

Eucharia Chimbuzor Nwachukwu eucharia.nwachukwu at
Fri Apr 7 19:18:24 UTC 2017

Greetings to you all. I expected this protracted argument over the proposal
raised by the co-chair. Similar argument and counter arguments necessitated
the failure of the past proposals. Many of us are enjoying your
contributions but it leads no where if everyone claims to be right. Let's
reason together. I am personally proud of you all but the question remains
that we need soft landing policy. Do we forget about it because the two
previous proposals couldn't achieve concensus? I do not see it as bad idea
if the co-chairs should champion a proposal for a workable soft landing
policy. I also do not see it a bad idea if good points are picked from the
previous proposals that didn't survive.
Please, let's move forward!
Thank you.
Eucharia chimbuzor Nwachukwu

On Apr 7, 2017 19:45, "Noah" <noah at> wrote:

On 7 Apr 2017 9:11 p.m., "SamiSalih" <sami at> wrote:

Please check
for ipv6 traffic


If i may, what % of clients behind the firewalls are using IPv6 source

RPD mailing list
RPD at
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the RPD mailing list