Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[rpd] Fwd: new policy proposal "Soft Landing - SD"

Douglas Onyango ondouglas at
Sun Apr 2 18:58:00 UTC 2017

aHi Mark,
On 2 April 2017 at 21:11, Mark Elkins <mje at> wrote:
> I'd prefer to see a /16 - rather than /17. Makes rDNS much simpler if
> someone gets a full /16. Also reduces the total number of players to 64
> (if everyone gets a /16) which means we might actually use the space in
> a reasonable time period.

As you have seen from our problem statement, we arrived at the /17
after doing some analysis. We have requested further staff analysis on
the same. We shall advise on a practical solution ASAP.

> Fine - as long as one can return multiple times without any limits ( or
> is that a /17 (preferably a /16))

Yes, the maximum cap is the /17. We feel that this is the best way to
cater for the new comers, and small ISPs all at the same time.

Douglas Onyango, PRINCE 2, ITILv3
UG: +256 776 716 138

More information about the RPD mailing list