Search RPD Archives
[rpd] Report of the Soft Landing isuue
dewole at forum.org.ng
Mon Mar 27 07:52:27 UTC 2017
The proposal "already in the PDP" (as you put it) deals with a wide variety of areas. That collection of areas has not found consensus. If the authors choose to whittle the proposal down to those areas that the community largely agrees on, the co-chairs would not need to point out areas that volunteers can adopt and put forward.
Although proposals (once submitted to the RPD list) are supposed to be owned by the community and not the authors, the current definition/implementation of the AFRINIC PDP does not promote that enough. I stand to be corrected but I think that is why we find ourselves in this logjam today.
The submission presented by co-chairs a week ago was to allow a chance to do things the collaborative way. A chance to disconnect from whatever sentiments exist and tackle policy issues (which is why we are here).
I fail to see what makes you think the co-chairs are focusing on authors rather than policy.
Sent from a mobile device. Please excuse typos and autocorrect strangeness.
> On 26 Mar 2017, at 8:52 PM, Honest Ornella GANKPA <honest1989 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Dewole,
> 2017-03-26 18:37 GMT+01:00 Dewole Ajao <dewole at forum.org.ng>:
>> There is more to benefit from collaborating on a single draft rather than spewing out multiple proposals.
> Agreed! So why are you asking for new proposals when there is already one in PDP. Co-chairs need to focus on policy not authors.
> Honest Ornella GANKPA
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the RPD