Re: [rpd] Afrinic policy proposal—Afrinic Service guild lines

[Lu]

Hi

W have been told our allocation is "under board review" for past 2 month, I wonder how's that to be possible if board ha nothing to do with this?

This transmission is intended solely for the addressee(s) shown above.
It may contain information that is privileged, confidential or
otherwise protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use
of this transmission or its contents by persons other than the intended addressee(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify this office immediately and e-mail the original at the sender's address above by replying to this message and including the text of the transmission received.

> On 2014年10月27日, at 上午4:13, Bill Woodcock <woody at pch.net> wrote:
> 
> 
> On Oct 27, 2014, at 3:22 AM, David Conrad <drc at virtualized.org> wrote:
>>> 5.Unless otherwise appealed, Afrinic board should not be directly involved in IP allocation process.
>> 
>> Agreed, although I do not think the board should be involved in appeals.
>> 
>> It used to be that in at least two other RIRs that I'm familiar with (APNIC and ARIN), the board would _never_ be directly involved in the IP allocation process.  The role of the boards of those two RIRs was to ensure the policy development process was followed correctly and to be ultimately responsible for the operation of the organization. I don't know if that's still the case.
> 
> That is the case.  In ARIN, there is an explicit wall between the board and the resource allocation process, so that the board is never involved in specific resource requests, reviews, or fulfillment.  I believe that to be the case in other RIRs as well.
> 
>                                -Bill
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rpd mailing list
> rpd at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rpd