[rpd] Re: [members-discuss] Virtual Africa is the logical target for IP address colonists

[Adiel Akplogan]

[I think that the discussion has taken a path which now need it to be moved to the rpd list]

On Jun 18, 2014, at 17:13 PM, Douglas Onyango <ondouglas at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 18 June 2014 12:02, Adiel Akplogan <adiel at afrinic.net> wrote:
>> In this discussion I don't think the real challenge is about organisations that already have a well established footprint in the region trying to expend their network out of Africa, but rather about how far an IP Analyst can go using his/her own judgment in cases where a company (new or not) recently decide to enter the IP service business/market and is requesting resources that will obviously be used in majority (up to 5%-90% as we already seen) outside of the region.
> 
> I agree with the problem description. I have said the same thing in a
> previous email and also mentioned that the policy I am drafting will
> strike a balance between the two interests.

Good to hear this.

- a.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 313 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20140618/6268bdf3/attachment.sig>