[rpd] Guessing is not the way to verify information

[Lu Heng]

i am not crazy, you been crazy saying another person in a discussion
in a public meeting list crazy.

and what is the definition of your "entire community" here? total 20
people in the room and quite some of them might not agree with you to
begin with?

noncom rejecting me on the first basis saying in which i do not send
in mission statement---in which they never asked for---so it has
nothing to do with exposing the truth to begin with.

And I do not think I own any an apology by helping improve the
nomination process, and make it more transparent.

and "guessing" worked or not is irrelevant, it is like killing redeem
people in the street then that people happen to be criminal. killing
redeem people is wrong anyway you still have to be arrested regardless
if that person is criminal or not. I don't think any where in the
world jurisdiction system would support such behaviour. it works or
not can not justify the fact it is wrong for telling other people who
they are.




On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Jackson Muthili <jacksonmuthi at gmail.com> wrote:
> Are you crazy? You are a fraudster and  liar and this was been
> established in front on entire community.
>
> You want nomcom to apologize for exposing truth????
>
> On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Lu Heng <h.lu at anytimechinese.com> wrote:
>> The whole point that requirement was not valid according to bylaw
>> itself,  and assuring me for being fraud is largely in-appreciate and
>> in-correct.
>>
>> Both of your fail to understand a simple principle,  an nomination
>> should be transparent to be legitimate to begin with. I guess that is
>> the reason most so called democracy government establish by one
>> western country in the world won't really a success. Because your guys
>> prefer a "black box".
>>
>> All I said, guessing the information(in which mark admitted in the
>> floor), was a wrong process, and both of your americans pop up and
>> start telling the floor it is the right process--it may works in your
>> country but I guess not anywhere else.
>>
>> And plus, I has never arguing about being the chair or not--as I said
>> multiple times, results does not matter to me--if I be the chair and
>> helping the community, I am happy, but if community thinks someone
>> else more capable then me, I will support the new chair as well.
>>
>> End of the day, THE NOMINATION PROCESS NEED TO BE IMPROVED, and
>> nomination committee should apologise to me for telling me who I am.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 5:44 AM, Owen DeLong <owen at delong.com> wrote:
>>> That was said largely tongue in cheek and you failed to get it.
>>>
>>> The reality was that you made a fraudulent application claiming residency in a country where you have an office, but do not reside. Your fraud was noticed by the nominating committee and your candidacy was rejected.
>>>
>>> Then you accused them of guessing instead of asking you, so multiple people asked you. You basically refused to state your residency, but when finally pushed, you admitted that you did not live in the service region.
>>>
>>> After that, the phrase "but he guessed right" was used as a semi-humorous retort to your continued and repeated accusation that he guessed. In reality, your fraud attempt was noted and you were removed from the slate for entirely legitimate reasons. The process worked and the correct outcome was achieved.
>>>
>>> It's past time to move on from this absurdity.
>>>
>>> Owen
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Jun 5, 2014, at 4:41 PM, Lu Heng <h.lu at anytimechinese.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hey everybody:
>>>>
>>>> Today on the floor that is a common said guessing is a way to
>>>> verifying information for noncom--as long as you guess it right.
>>>>
>>>> I think it is not the right way of doing things. just a common.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> --
>>>> Kind regards.
>>>> Lu
>>>>
>>>> This transmission is intended solely for the addressee(s) shown above.
>>>> It may contain information that is privileged, confidential or
>>>> otherwise protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use
>>>> of this transmission or its contents by persons other than the
>>>> intended addressee(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received
>>>> this transmission in error, please notify this office immediately and
>>>> e-mail the original at the sender's address above by replying to this
>>>> message and including the text of the transmission received.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> rpd mailing list
>>>> rpd at afrinic.net
>>>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rpd
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> --
>> Kind regards.
>> Lu
>>
>> This transmission is intended solely for the addressee(s) shown above.
>> It may contain information that is privileged, confidential or
>> otherwise protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use
>> of this transmission or its contents by persons other than the
>> intended addressee(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received
>> this transmission in error, please notify this office immediately and
>> e-mail the original at the sender's address above by replying to this
>> message and including the text of the transmission received.
>> _______________________________________________
>> rpd mailing list
>> rpd at afrinic.net
>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rpd



-- 
--
Kind regards.
Lu

This transmission is intended solely for the addressee(s) shown above.
It may contain information that is privileged, confidential or
otherwise protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use
of this transmission or its contents by persons other than the
intended addressee(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received
this transmission in error, please notify this office immediately and
e-mail the original at the sender's address above by replying to this
message and including the text of the transmission received.