Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[AFRINIC-rpd] Last call - Academic IPv4 Allocation- AFPUB-2013-GEN-001-DRAFT-03 -

serge ilunga sergekbk at yahoo.fr
Fri Jul 12 11:10:33 UTC 2013


Dear All,

I don't support this policy.
In fact, This is a challenging situation.
HEI having IT infrastructure and in need of more IP Ressources (supposed to have skills for IP v6 deployment)
HEI with poor IT infrastructure and which doesn't even have a pool of IP from Afrinic.
With the IP V4 addreeses exhaustion, my opinion is that the policies should avoid to set conditions for IPv4 Trade on the black market and encourage IPv6 deployment.
This policy is making easy the allocation process to HEI who are considered as end user >>>reduced fees>>>good opportunity for black market.
The non application of this policy will speed up the spread of IP v6 in HEI.

With Regards.


 
Serge ILUNGA KABWIKA
MSN Id: sergekbk at hotmail.com
Skype Id: sergekbk
Cell:+243814443160


________________________________
 De : Maye Diop <mayediop at gmail.com>
À : McTim <dogwallah at gmail.com> 
Cc : rpd <rpd at afrinic.net> 
Envoyé le : Vendredi 12 juillet 2013 9h07
Objet : Re: [AFRINIC-rpd] Last call - Academic IPv4 Allocation- AFPUB-2013-GEN-001-DRAFT-03 -
 


Dear All,
Just to remaiin that I don't support this policy.
Best Regards




2013/7/11 McTim <dogwallah at gmail.com>


>
>
>On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 7:19 PM, Alan Barrett <apb at cequrux.com> wrote:
>
>On Tue, 09 Jul 2013, Andrew Alston wrote:
>>
>>As of posting that last summary with each of the answers, I have yet to
>>>see emails objecting to the answers given, and as such I believe it is
>>>fair to assume that the majority accepts those answers as written?
>>>
>>
No, it's not fair to make that assumption. 
>>
>
>
>
>
>+1
>
>
>The answers to the questions I have posed have not recieved an answer that I consider satisfactory.  In other words, I do not think the problem as stated needs a policy fix, and if it did, it would not be *this* policy I would choose.
>
>
>I also feel that changing the basis of allocating and assigning resources from one based on need to one based on population size is misguided at best.
>
>
>I remain opposed to the policy as written.
>-- 
>Cheers,
>
>McTim
>"A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route indicates how we get there."  Jon Postel 
>_______________________________________________
>rpd mailing list
>rpd at afrinic.net
>https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rpd
>
>


-- 
---------------------
Mme Ndéye Maimouna DIOP
Spécialiste ICT4D

_______________________________________________
rpd mailing list
rpd at afrinic.net
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rpd
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20130712/2a8b0e3d/attachment.html>


More information about the RPD mailing list