Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[AFRINIC-rpd] Latest version of the policy AFPUB-2013-GEN-001-DRAFT-03

Sunday Folayan sfolayan at
Mon Jun 24 22:24:19 UTC 2013


It is appropriate at this point to say .....

Congrats on your 2013 Nii award. In addition to all your hats, your
willingness and sacrifice last year to co chair this WG is testament to
your versatility and commitment.

More grease to your elbow!

On 24 Jun 2013 20:06, "Alan Barrett" <apb at> wrote:

> On Mon, 24 Jun 2013, Andrew Alston wrote:
>> I do have a question to the PDWG chair's (or even the ex chairs) about
>> this situation though.  [...]
>> If the Face to Face meeting is evaluated in conjunction with the last
>> call voices on the list, am I to conclude that these are evaluated
>> together, and as such, 5 objections on the list + 5 objections on the
>> floor, even if totalled together = 10 objections, against 60+ votes in
>> favour, we still have consensus?
> As an ex-chair, I don't think that counting votes should be definitive.
>  One serious objection can outweight many "me too" voices in favour, and
> vice versa.  The chairs should be looking at the arguments more than at the
> number of people, but both are relevant.
>  Or is there segregation between the last call and the on the floor vote?
>>  If there is, can I please understand how this is reconciled with the above
>> extract on the process?
> I think the chairs can consider everything.  The end result should reflect
> the will of the community as a whole.
> --apb (Alan Barrett)
> ______________________________**_________________
> rpd mailing list
> rpd at
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the RPD mailing list