[AFRINIC-rpd] IPv4 Address Allocation and Assignment proposal

[Ernest - (AfriNIC)]

Hi Andrew,

Andrew Alston wrote thus on 1/25/13 4:48 PM:
> Hi Ernest, PDP Members,
> 
> I want to clarify something.
> 
> In the event of a new policy that conflicts with an older policy, is there a
> de-facto state of the newer superseding the older?  
> 
> I.E if we implemented this new policy where it conflicts with the current
> policies, would it automatically supersede them?

Correct.

Currently, any new proposal would need to indicate which of current
proposals it amends (or obsoletes), a process which was not explicit
at the time that AFPUB-2006-GEN-001 was proposed.

Regards,
Ernest.