Search RPD Archives
[AfriNIC-rpd] Definitions of LIR versus End User
Sunday Folayan
sfolayan at gmail.com
Sun Jul 22 07:46:24 UTC 2012
Andrew,
You and I elected a Board. They are representatives of the community,
knowledgeable and of course, they have a responsibility. They should be
left to carry it out. We do not need to query all expenditures like
Travels, Lobbying, ICANN, IP Research, Trainings, Linkages, leap-frog
Technologies, etc. After that, we will being to argue about impact
assessment, priorities, Per $ contribution of AfriNIC to fighting Sahara
desert encroachment etc etc etc.
I think this route is poisonous, lets exit the loop.
Please note that I am not saying people should not be accountable, nor
should we not raise legitimate queries. I just believe we should
exercise discretion when necessary.
Sunday.
On 21/07/2012 20:54, Andrew Alston wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Sorry, just a correction to my below email. I referred to the
> financials presented in Ghana, I meant to say Gambia.
>
> Thanks
>
> Andrew
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Andrew Alston
> <alston.networks at gmail.com <mailto:alston.networks at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I've been sitting thinking about this a fair bit, and perhaps we
> do need a very close look at the fee structure, that being said,
> under the way that AfriNIC works, the fees are the domain of the
> board rather than the community, hence the community is left with
> policy only options should they feel the fee structures aren't
> working for them (Well, thats my understanding, someone can
> correct me if I'm wrong).
>
> Now, with regards to the policy, as I've said, I do feel that
> until we can resolve the issue around the fee structures, we need
> the definitions tightened up, and I still believe that, but I'm
> going to leave that alone for a minute and look at the fees.
>
> Here are a couple of thoughts on this firstly.
>
> AfriNIC is an organization that is fairly new, operating on a
> continent that has a fairly low internet penetration rate when
> compared with the other regions. They also, because they are the
> youngest of the RIR's, have less total space to assign and hence
> less total overall revenue that can be generated in annual fees.
> This WILL have an effect on their pricing. However, this has to
> be balanced with economic reality, and that reality is that the
> prices in Africa for internet related resources (be it bandwidth,
> access, IP addresses etc) are also having an effect on growth in
> the region. I believe though (without empirical evidence I
> admit), that the AfriNIC fees as they currently stand DO however
> promote systemic use of network address translation. The economic
> realities of operating in the ISP environment in Africa leave
> people trying to scrape every cent from anywhere just to survive,
> particularly with the smaller players trying to start their own
> ISP's, and if you can NAT and save yourself a few thousand dollars
> a year, well, that's whats going to happen.
>
> Now, this leads to the next question. Why are AfriNIC fees what
> they are. I will be the first to state, that AfriNIC has to be
> financially viable, the organization HAS to generate enough
> revenue to sustain itself, that being said, I think below we can
> look at the fee structures in any coherent way, we need to
> understand certain things. Therefore, I want to ask AfriNIC, in
> the name of transparency, to provide certain information which I
> have been unable to find on the website, so that the community as
> a whole can analyse this.
>
> a.) How many LIR's are there in each category of membership
> b.) How many End Users are there in each category of membership.
>
> Once we have answers to (a) and (b) we can potentially start
> looking at shifting costs if necessary from one to the other (in
> particular on the annual maintenance basis)
>
> Then, the trick to lowering the costs of IP space is also to look
> at AfriNIC's running costs, and since this is a community based
> organization, I feel it is fair to question some of these costs
> and get some explanations so that we can better understand where
> the money we, as the community, are spending is going to. The
> financial reports presented in Ghana where, in my opinion, a
> little ambiguous and fairly hard to figure out exactly what was
> meant by each line item, which also didn't help this situation.
>
> I'd like to better understand the need for AfriNIC's staff
> compliment as well, after all, AfriNIC's core business is to
> allocate IP addresses to its community, yet it employs 34 full
> time staff according to its website, and is advertising for more.
> At the same time, from what I can see from the website, and
> again, I say I am open to correction, it only employs 2
> individuals in the hostmaster position. These two individuals
> also travel extensively, and this leads to severe delays in
> evaluating and approving requests (which is the CORE business of
> AfriNIC). I fail at this point to understand why in a staff
> compliment of 34 staff, there seem to be a relative few number
> dedicated to what is the core business, and I'd like AfriNIC to
> comment on this. I also understand the need for AfriNIC's
> involvement in ICANN/IANA/etc, since we HAVE to be involved in the
> global community, however, I would like to see what this
> involvement is costing AfriNIC at the end of the day, and how this
> is contributing to the fees.
>
> Basically, what I'm trying to get at is this. A.) Are the LIR and
> End User fees disproportional, and B.) are the costs involved in
> running AfriNIC that necessitate these fees really justified and
> can we get better insight into these running costs.
>
> I think once we get some better understanding, particularly in
> regards to the balance of the membership base, we can take a far
> better look at this, and I look forward to hearing AfriNIC's
> response to the community on these questions.
>
> Thanks
>
> Andrew
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rpd mailing list
> rpd at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rpd
--
--------------------------------------------------------
Sunday Adekunle Folayan
blog: http://www.sundayfolayan.name.ng
email: sfolayan at skannet.com.ng, sfolayan at gmail.com
phone: +234-802-291-2202
skype: sfolayan
fcbk: www.facebook.com/sfolayan
tweet: sfolayan
linkedin: sfolayan
---------------------------------------------------------
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20120722/bc91d90e/attachment.html>
More information about the RPD
mailing list