[AfriNIC-rpd] Definitions of LIR versus End User

Sat Jul 21 13:13:06 UTC 2012

Hi Nii,
What I believe is that huge differences in the fee structures applicable to various groups of allocatees should be  justified in terms of AfriNIC's obligations and responsibility as a RIR to ensure/promote good Internet numbering practice in the Region.
Your remark correctly that my first statement could be an assumption (that present differences in the charges to End-User and LIRs are based on perceptions of the prices and implicit cross-subsidisations that different market segments will tolerate).  This is an hypothesis that helps to explain the fee differences.
It would be great to see an explantion why these fee differences are indeed essential to promote good numbering practices.
Duncan Martin

________________________________

From: Nii Narku Quaynor [mailto:quaynor at ghana.com]
Sent: Sat 2012/07/21 10:21 AM
To: Duncan Martin
Cc: Sunday Folayan; Guy Antony Halse; AfriNIC Resource Policy Discussion List
Subject: Re: [AfriNIC-rpd] Definitions of LIR versus End User

On Jul 21, 2012, at 4:28, "Duncan Martin" <ceo at tenet.ac.za> wrote:

	I support Sunday's call for a review of AfriNIC's fee structures.
	The present huge differences between the fees charged to End-Users and those charged to LIRs show that AfriNIC's fees are not based on cost-recovery, as would befit a non-profit entity, but, evidently, on perceptions of the prices and implicit cross-subsidisations that different market segments will tolerate.

This could be an assumption 

	If definitions of End Users and LIRs and distinctions between End Users and LIRs are indeed required in AfriNIC's fee structures, should these not be justified in terms of AfriNIC's obligations and responsibility as a RIR to ensure/promote good Internet numbering practice in the Region?

Please explain why you think AfriNIC is not promoting good numbering practices

	Duncan Martin
________________________________

	From: rpd-bounces at afrinic.net on behalf of Sunday Folayan
	Sent: Fri 2012/07/20 09:36 PM
	To: Guy Antony Halse
	Cc: AfriNIC Resource Policy Discussion List
	Subject: Re: [AfriNIC-rpd] Definitions of LIR versus End User

	All of this exercise at definitions and ambiguity discoveries points to a total warp in the afrinic fee structure. That is what needs equitable review, not definitions.

	My 1 micro-lira.

	SF.

		On 13 Jul 2012 08:13, "Guy Antony Halse" <G.halse at ru.ac.za> wrote:

		Hi

		On Wed 2012-07-11 (20:12), Seun Ojedeji wrote:
		> end-user:
		> An end-user is an organization receivi...

		When coupled with the definition of LIR:

		> > A Local Internet Registry (LIR) is an IR that receives allocations from
		> > an RIR and primaril...

		this creates exactly the sort of ambiguity I referred to previously.

		There exists the potential for an organisation that neither uses its IP
		assignments *exclusively* for its internal use, nor *primarily* assigns
		address space to end-users.  (Note the emphasised words.)  From the
		discussions, most universities come to mind.

		Ergo (at least some) universities are neither end-users nor LIRs.

		Which is why I think that end-user should be !(LIR || RIR).

		- Guy
		-- 
		Systems Manager, IT Division, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa
		Email: G.Halse...

		_______________________________________________
		rpd mailing list
		rpd at afrinic.net
		https://lists.afrin. <https://lists.afrin./> ..

	_______________________________________________
	rpd mailing list
	rpd at afrinic.net
	https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rpd

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20120721/c3c7be50/attachment.html>