Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[AfriNIC-rpd] NomCom at AFRINIC-16

Nii Narku Quaynor quaynor at
Mon May 21 16:17:34 UTC 2012

On May 21, 2012, at 15:10, Mark Elkins <mje at> wrote:

> On Mon, 2012-05-21 at 16:14 +0300, Maina Noah wrote:
>> On 21 May 2012 16:04, Jackson Muthili <jacksonmuthi at> wrote:
>>        On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Maina Noah
>>        <mainanoa at> wrote:
>>> To me that would be dictatorship and there is no room for
>>        dictatorship in a
>>> community driven organization like AfriNIC.
>>> Yes a > number of membership is great for Afrinic's progress
>>        but is not
>>> justification for countries with more stake at AfriNIC to
>>        assume the board
>>> directorship and needless to say, are the folks from such
>>        countries with
>>> greater number of LIR's actually
>>> representing the community well on the board.?  or their
>>        intentions are
>>> actually self-centered?
>>        Dictatorship by the south africans or unto them? Constituting
>>        majority
>>        of membership and addresses, why should SA not get
>>        commensurate stake
>>        on the board?
>> I think we should shift this discussion to something more relevant.
>> How about we forget about
>> Countries like .za with more Afrinic membership wishing for stake on
>> the board and rather look at 
>> individual capabilities and experience from a prospective candidate,
>> as remember folks are fighting
>> to get on board but seem to have individual or rather nationalistic
>> goals than being African community
>> Centered. 
>> We elect this folks to go and represent the continent and not the
>> regions and individual countries...Take note
>> of that.
> Good comment. Perhaps people should take a look at the Proposed By-Law
> changes. To download a copy, go to
> (ie - its not yet on but linked from the new website)
> Here the concept of non-regional director is discussed along with the
> removal of Alternative board members. (section 12.4).
> As currently stated, the Elders (there are three of them, Dr Nii
> Quaynor, Pierre Dandjinou and Viv Padayatchy) get to somewhat choose the
> non-geographical directors. The concept of selecting non-geographical
> directors is fine - look for good Board qualities, Auditors, Finance
> people, etc -
this is fine: perhaps some selection scheme for elders after we have 5-7 ex-chairs would do
> but make the selection of these people a bit more open
> (include the current board as part of the selection committee) and
> always have a choice of people (say three) so that the general
> membership can then vote their preference as part of the normal election
> process. I'd assume the two non-geographical directors would have
> staggered terms too.
How about: The community propose/many avenues the potential non geographic directors to the elders separately is better. Elders select in support of the geographic elected board. One would keep the board out of it as not good select themselves. 

Advise and select the non geographic directors is ok
> -- 
>  .  .     ___. .__      Posix Systems - (South) Africa
> /| /|       / /__       mje at  -  Mark J Elkins, Cisco CCIE
> / |/ |ARK \_/ /__ LKINS  Tel: +27 12 807 0590  Cell: +27 82 601 0496
> _______________________________________________
> rpd mailing list
> rpd at

More information about the RPD mailing list