Search RPD Archives
[AfriNIC-rpd] Pushing IPv6
Raz BIRAMAH
rbiramah at ipi9.com
Mon Nov 28 14:27:44 UTC 2011
I think also that a policy should be the right thing to do, but a policy that consist of encouragement not sound like an obligation.
Raz
Le 26 nov. 2011 à 18:30, Owen DeLong a écrit :
>
> On Nov 26, 2011, at 2:45 AM, Adiel Akplogan wrote:
>
>>
>> On 2011-11-26, at 10:28 AM, Owen DeLong wrote:
>>
>>> I believe ARIN staff uses IPv4 applications from organizations that do not have IPv6 as an
>>> opportunity for outreach. Doing so does not require force-feeding IPv6 blocks to people that
>>> are not going to use them.
>>
>> Currently AfriNIC hostmasters informally use every new IPv4 requests
>> to raise awareness on IPv6 by gently asking the requestor if they
>> would like at the same time to request IPv6? If they have a plan
>> they request it, if they don't yet have a plan of they generally just
>> decline the offer and only get their IPv4 prefix. Some of them do come
>> back few months letter with an IPv6 request.
>>
>> So using the opportunity of IPv4 request to promote IPv6 is something
>> that we consider as part of our "responsibility" and outreach campaign,
>> but what we can not do right now is to to make it a condition for IPv4
>> or force it upon LIR. To be able to do so, we will clearly need to
>> define a policy for that.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> - a.
>>
>
> As I have said, I think such a policy and such a practice would be ill advised at best.
>
> Owen
>
> _______________________________________________
> rpd mailing list
> rpd at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rpd
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20111128/90b0d1b0/attachment.html>
More information about the RPD
mailing list