Search RPD Archives
[AfriNIC-rpd] Section 3.8 of AFPUB-2010-v4-005-draft-02 - IPv4 Soft Landing
sm+afrinic at elandsys.com
sm+afrinic at elandsys.com
Sat May 21 07:09:11 UTC 2011
This was a Consensus call on the following sentence in Section 3.8 of
AFPUB-2010-v4-005-draft-02 (IPv4 Soft Landing proposal):
"For each allocation or assignment made during the Exhaustion Phase,
no more than 10% of these resources may be used outside of the
AfriNIC region, and any use outside the AfriNIC region shall be
solely in support of connectivity back to the AfriNIC region."
This is a rough summary of the discussion:
5 May 2011 - James Blessing objected on the grounds that it is
unenforceable but also a hinderance to African networks looking to
expand into other regions.
5 May 2011 - Andrew Alston is opposed to the sentence.
5 May 2011 - Graham Beneke is opposed to the sentence.
5 May 2011 - Dr Paulos Nyirenda opposed the consensus call.
5 May 2011 - Maye diop supports the sentence.
5 May 2011 - Mark Elkins supports the sentence.
5 May 2011 - Owen DeLong supports the sentence.
5 May 2011 - Douglas Onyango is the author of the proposal.
6 May 2011 - JP Viljoen opposed the sentence and mentioned that
artificially limiting the potential use by entities (and thereby
effectively limiting any use whatsoever) on in this in a non-AfriNIC
region seems like a very bad move. One reason provided was "Your
biggest customer wants to branch into a European office and requires
a /24 there, but since your total allocation is a /22, it exceeds the
10% mark".
6 May 2011 - Frank Habicht would like the sentence to stay in.
6 May 2011 - McTim would like the sentence to stay in.
6 May 2011 - J Walubengo "asked whether the current IPv4 allocation
policy have this suddenly contentious 10% rule".
6 May 2011 - David Conrad asked about the role of a "Regional
Internet REGISTRY".
6 May 2011 - Daniam Henriques is opposed.
6 May 2011 - Simon Balthazar would like the sentence to remain.
7 May 2011 - Komlan Togbedji mentioned that it is "normal that Africa
public IP address could be used outside Africa when african
organisations or companies expand to other areas".
All the comments provided will be taken into account for the Last
Call on AFPUB-2010-v4-005-draft-03. I would like to remind authors
that they can contact AfriNIC for administrative support and
assistance in drafting their proposals.
Regards,
S. Moonesamy
Interim co-chair
More information about the RPD
mailing list