Search rpd Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[AfriNIC-rpd] Global Policy for post exhaustion IPv4 allocation mechanisms by the IANA

Douglas Onyango ondouglas at yahoo.com
Thu Apr 28 15:48:50 SAST 2011


Hello All,
Inline with the Policy Development Process and as an author, i am submitting the 
above proposal for discussion.

===================================================================================

Unique identifier:AFPUB-2011-v4-004-draft-01
Draft Policy Name: Global Policy for post exhaustion IPv4 allocation mechanisms 
by the IANA
Authors:            Douglas Onyango    | ondouglas at yahoo.com
                        Alejandro Acosta | alejandro.acosta at bt.com | British 
Telecom 

                        S. Moonesamy    | sm+afrinic at elandsys.com
                        Nicolas Antoniello | nantoniello at gmail.com
                        Medel Ramirez | medel at globetel.com.ph | Globe Telecom, 
Inc
                        Masato Yamanishi | myamanis at bb.softbank.co.jp | Softbank 
BB Corp
                        Philip Smith |pfs at cisco.com  | Cisco Systems
Draft Version: 1
Submitted: 2011-03-29



1. Summary of the Problem Being Addressed by this Policy Proposal

The IANA has now exhausted its pool of IPv4 /8 blocks, having 
distributed its remaining IPv4 addresses according to the "Global
Policy for the Allocation of the Remaining IPv4 Address Space".[1] 
However, there is the possibility that IANA will receive returned
addresses post-exhaustion of its pool of /8s.

An earlier global policy proposal authored by a team consisting of
people from each of the five RIRs reached consensus at four RIRs, and
was subsequently endorsed by these RIRs' Boards. In the APNIC region,
this was prop-069, "Global policy proposal for the allocation of IPv4
blocks to Regional Internet Registries". To see the proposal reference
number for this proposal in all five RIRs, see Appendix A.

The version approved in the fifth region was substantially rewritten by
that community to meet some of their concerns. However, given the 
nature of the rewrites, it would have been difficult to reconcile that
version with the version that reached concensus in the other four RIRs.
Therefore, some members of the ARIN community wrote a new global
proposal, "Global Policy for IPv4 Allocations by the IANA Post
Exhaustion", which has been adopted in the ARIN region. It is under
discussion in the AfriNIC, APNIC and RIPE regions. In the APNIC region,
it is prop-086. To see the proposal reference number for this proposal
in all five RIRs, see Appendix A. However, there are significant issues
with prop-086. These are:

    - The reclamation pool could be exhausted by RIR(s) with high
      allocation rates after the first (or first few) allocation
      period(s). 

      There are two main reasons RIRs will have differing allocation
      rates after the IANA pool is exhausted:

      1. Rate of Internet growth in the region

      2. Policies developed by different regions governing
         how the last part of their IPv4 addresses are to be
         managed.

      In response to IPv4 exhaustion, some RIR communities have chosen
      to apply policies to a part of their last IPv4 addresses that aim
      to assist with a smooth transition to IPv6. An effect of such
      policies is that it can slow down the consumption of IPv4
      addresses allocated under these policies. This side effect would
      put RIRs that have chosen to adopt such policies at a
      disadvantage, as they will take far longer to qualify for space
      under prop-086 compared to RIRs that have chosen not to adopt
      such policies. Therefore, to ensure that regional variation in
      runout policy amongst RIRs is accounted for, it is important to
      have an IANA redistribution method that can continue to provide
      resources to RIRs over more than one (or only a few) allocation
      periods.
      
        - The definitions of when an RIR is considered to be 
          "exhausted", and therefore eligible for space from IANA,
          should be more flexible given the very different RIR policy
          environments and the number of addresses available at any
          given time.
  
        - Under the redistribution formula proposed in prop-086, it is
          possible for one RIR to be the single eligible RIR in the
          first IANA allocation period and for that RIR to claim the
          entire reclamation pool. It is also possible that only one RIR
          could be eligible during subsequent allocation periods, and
          take the total IANA pool available at that time.
  
          To prevent this from happening, it is better to have a formula
          that would allow RIRs to take only a certain fraction of the
          IANA pool at each allocation period.
       
       
A problem with both prop-069 and prop-086 is related to the policy for
the return of addresses by the RIRs to IANA:

    - In prop-069, the return of addresses to the reclamation pool was
       mandatory. This restriction was of significant concern to the
      ARIN community.
 
    - In prop-086, return of addresses by RIRs is optional, but there
      is nothing to prevent an RIR which has contributed nothing 
      towards IANA's return pool from claiming part, or indeed all, of
      the return pool.
       
    
2. Summary of How this Proposal Addresses the Problem

This proposal describes the process that IANA will follow to allocate 
IPv4 resources to Regional Internet Registries (RIRs) after the central
pool of addresses is exhausted.

The processes for how IPv4 space may be placed in the IANA Recovered 
IPv4 Pool is out of the scope of this proposal.

- Because of the two above issues, this new proposal separates the
  return of address space to the IANA from the redistribution of
      that space by the IANA. Instead, the authors of this new proposal
      treat the return and redistribution as two separate issues that
      should be treated as separate policies.


A problem with prop-069, prop-086, and the first version of prop-097
is that attempts to find ways to make "eligibility" and "exhaustion"
meet the differing needs of all five RIRs caused problems for at least
of the RIRs. 

    - To avoid this situation, this second version of prop-097 invokes
      the precedent of last global policy for IPv4 distribution by the
      IANA[1] to propose an alternative way to distribute space from the
      IANA. That is, that there be an equal distribution of addresses
      between all RIRs.


3. The Proposal

Upon adoption of this IPv4 address policy by the ICANN Board of
Directors, the IANA shall establish a Recovered IPv4 Pool to be
utilized post RIR IPv4 exhaustion as defined in Section 1. The
Recovered IPv4 Pool will initially contain any fragments that may be
left over in the IANA. It will also hold any space returned to the IANA
by any other means.

3.1 Recovered IPv4 Pool

    The Recovered IPv4 Pool will be administered by the IANA. It will 
    contain:

    a. Any fragments left over in the IANA inventory after the last /8s
       of IPv4 space are delegated to the RIRs
       
       - The IANA inventory excludes "Special use IPv4 addresses" as
         defined in BCP 153 and any addresses allocated by the IANA
         for experimental use.
         
    b. Any IPv4 space returned to the IANA by any means. 


    The Recovered IPv4 Pool will stay inactive until the first RIR has
    less than a total of a /9 in its inventory of IPv4 address space.

    When one of the RIRs declares it has less than a total of a /9 in
    its inventory, the Recovered IPv4 pool will be declared active, 
    and IP addresses from the Recovered IPv4 Pool will be allocated 
    as stated in Section 4.2 below.


3.2 Allocation of returned IPv4 address space by the IANA

    a.  Allocations from the IANA may begin once the pool is declared
        active.

    b.  In each "IPv4 allocation period", each RIR will receive a
        single "IPv4 allocation unit" from the IANA.

    c.  An "IPv4 allocation period" is defined as a 6-month period
        following 1 March or 1 September in each year.

    d.  The IANA will calculate the size of the "IPv4 allocation unit"
        at the following times:

        - When the Recovered IPv4 Pool is first activated
        - At the beginning of each IPv4 allocation period

        To calculate the "IPv4 allocation unit" at these times, the
        IANA will use the following formula:

            IPv4 allocation unit = 1/5 of Recovered IPv4 pool,
                                   rounded down to the next CIDR
                                   (power-of-2) boundary.

        No RIR may get more than this calculation used to determine the
        IPv4 allocation unit even when they can justify a need for it.

        The minimum "IPv4 allocation unit" size will be a /24.  If the
        calculation used to determine the IPv4 allocation unit results
        in a block smaller than a /24, the IANA will not distribute any
        addresses in that IPv4 allocation period.


3.3 Reporting 

    The IANA may make public announcements of IPv4 address transactions
    that occur under this policy.  The IANA will make appropriate
    modifications to the "Internet Protocol V4 Address Space" page of
    the IANA website [2] and may make announcements to its own
    appropriate announcement lists.  The IANA announcements will be
    limited to which address ranges, the time of allocation, and to
    which Registry they have been allocated.


4.  Pros/Cons
-------------

Advantages:

    - The policy provides a mechanism for the ongoing distribution of   
      IPv4 address space, while removing the areas of prop-069 that 
      were problematic for the ARIN community, and removing the
      problematic areas of prop-086. That is, the proposal:
      
       - Permits regional variation in runout policy amongst RIRs to be
         accounted for in the distribution of the Recovered IPv4 Pool

       - Prevents the possibility of a single RIR being eligible to 
         be allocated the entire Recovered IPv4 Pool in the first
         (and perhaps only) allocation period
         
       - Removes two areas of policy that have failed to reach
         agreement in previous attempts at this proposal:
         
          - How addresses should be placed in the Recovered IPv4 Pool
          - References to how transfers should or should not take place   
       

Disadvantages:

    - This proposal does not provide details of how address space may 
      be returned to the IANA IPv4 Recovered Pool.


5.  Timetable for implementation
Once consensus has been reached in each of the five RIR regions, the
policy will be forwarded to ICANN for approval and then implemented
by the IANA



6.  References
--------------

6.1. "Global Policy for the Allocation of the Remaining IPv4 Address
    Space"
    
    http://www.icann.org/en/general/allocation-remaining-ipv4-space.htm

6.2. "IANA IPv4 Address Space Registry", February 2011   
    http://www.iana.org/assignments/ipv4-address-space/ipv4-address-space.xml


Appendix A
----------

Proposal number given to "Global policy proposal for the allocation of
IPv4 blocks to Regional Internet Registries" in each of the five 
regions:

AfriNIC:     AFPUB-2009-v4-002
APNIC:       prop-069
ARIN:        ARIN-2009-3
LACNIC:      LAC-2009-01
RIPE:        RIPE 2009-01



Proposal number given to "Global Policy for IPv4 Allocations by the
IANA Post Exhaustion" in each of the five regions:

AfriNIC:     AFPUB-2010-v4-006
APNIC:       prop-086
ARIN:        ARIN-2010-10
LACNIC:      LAC-2010-04
RIPE:        RIPE 2010-05
===================================================================================


 
Regards,
Douglas Onyango | +256(0712)981329
Life is the educators practical joke in which you spend the first half learning, 
and the second half learning that everything you learned in the first was wrong.



More information about the rpd mailing list