[AfriNIC-rpd] Value of N for Global Policy for the Allocation of the Remaining IPv4 Address Space

[padkla@aviso.ci KLA]

N=1 is a good value

On 10/2/07, Hisham R Rojoa <hisham at afrinic.net> wrote:
>
> Dear Colleagues and Members
>
> The value of N is not set in this policy proposal.
> As discussed during the Public Policy Meeting it was agreed to ask the
> community what the value of N should be.
> At the face to face meeting, the value of N=1 & N=2 had the highest and
> same
> number of votes; i.e. 6. The other values of N had no votes.
>
> We would appreciate if the community could indicate what their preference
> is
> for the value of N before the end of the last call.
>
> Best Regards
> Hisham
>
> _____________________________________________
> From: Hisham R Rojoa [mailto:hisham at afrinic.net]
> Sent: 02 October 2007 10:43
> To: 'AfriNIC Resource Policy Discussion List'
> Subject: Last call for comments for Global Policy for the Allocation of
> the
> Remaining IPv4 Address Space
>
>
> Dear Colleagues and Members
>
> The Global Policy for the Allocation of the Remaining IPv4 Address Space
> reached consensus at our last meeting in Durban, South Africa.
> As per our Policy Development Process, this policy is now in the last call
> for comments phase.
> This phase will end on the 17th of October 2008.
>
> More details about the policy can be found at:
> http://www.afrinic.net/docs/policies/afpol-v4gp200707.htm
>
> Best Regards
>
> Hisham
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rpd mailing list
> rpd at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rpd
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20071002/4276ef74/attachment.html>