Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[AfriNIC-rpd] end-site assignment policy

Colin Alston colin at
Mon Sep 10 19:58:53 UTC 2007

On 10/09/2007 17:00 Ernest - (AfriNIC) wrote:
> We have been actively in touch with those organisations whose allocations
> are not yet announced (after 12 months) numerous times, reminding them
> about being in breach of the policy.
> In most cases, we have received acceptable explanation from them about
> the cause of the deployment delay, with commitment to deploy/announce the
> allocation at some time in the near future (usually, 1 - 3 months).
>> Is there some wording I've missed? Is this clause enforceable?
> Yes, the clause is enforceable. Please see clauses 6, 7 and 13 of the
> Registration Services Agreement (RSA) below:
>> Can "plan" be defined for me?
> Not straight forward to define - but will give an example: If ISP A is
> going to assign a /48 to each of his/her current 50 leased-line
> customers, this sounds like an acceptable plan to us.
> We will ordinarily ask for proper justification (in form of documented
> proof or otherwise), and allocate if the plan is satisfactorily justified.

Thanks for this, that all sounds perfectly reasonable :)

Colin Alston <colin at>

More information about the RPD mailing list