Search RPD Archives
[AfriNIC-rpd] end-site assignment policy
colin at thusa.co.za
Mon Sep 10 12:31:31 UTC 2007
On 10/09/2007 11:54 McTim wrote:
> Where are you seeing this text?
5.1.1 (c) and (d) which is held for the aforementioned organizations
The main thing here is that AfriNIC must be renewing these resources,
and the same clause must apply to renewal (as per my reading of 5.7).
My point is that renewing a /32 allocation to someone that appears to
show no interest in making use of it is quite a waste, or at least
there is no transparency in why these resources are being renewed and
are still not (and have never been) announced by the. I *do* want
these organizations to have IPv6 space, but I also want to see them
using it otherwise it's just a farce.
> AFAIK, no RIR has this kind of language in their policy documents.
I'm sure there is at least some kind of language to suggest that
requesting assignments without any apparent intention of making use of
them is not condoned or tolerated.
Colin Alston <colin at thusa.co.za>
More information about the RPD