Search RPD Archives
[AfriNIC-rpd] About the policy BOF
Bill Woodcock
woody at pch.net
Tue May 8 07:50:38 UTC 2007
On Tue, 8 May 2007, Leo Vegoda wrote:
> Who is able to vote and how many votes do they each have?
Leo: Are you asking this as a rhetorical question, as in "if you were to
switch from consensus to voting, who _would be_ able to vote...?"
As a point of reference, in the ARIN region, the consensus-assessment
process is done by a show of hands which is counted:
- The meeting chair restates or summarizes the issue at hand and the
policy or related policies which are being considered.
- The meeting chair says that consensus is going to be assessed.
- The meeting chair says the format of the way the question will
be called, how many alternate questions will be called, and
exactly what the questions will be:
"I'll now call for consensus on three questions: First, should a
new IPv7 minimum allocation size of /23-and-a-half apply to
organizations with a Z in their name. Second, should a new IPv7
minimum allocation size of /23-and-a-half apply to organizations
with either a Y or a Z in their name. Third, should there be no
change to existing policy."
- The ARIN staff count the number of people in the room.
- The meeting chair asks the first question.
- The meeting chair asks how many people in the room are in favor
of the proposition made by the first question, and hands are
counted by staff.
- The meeting chair asks the second question.
- The meeting chair asks how many people in the room are in favor
of the proposition made by the second question, and hands are counted
by staff.
- The meeting chair asks the Nth question.
- The meeting chair asks how many people in the room are in favor
of the proposition made by the Nth question, and hands are counted
by staff.
- Staff report the numbers to the meeting chair.
- The meeting chair announces how many people were in the room, how
many people were in favor of each proposition, how many people did
not vote.
- The meeting chair announces that the results will be conveyed to the
Policy Advisory Council, to help them in assessing consensus. (Which
they will do by considering both the number of hands counted in the
room, and the opinions expressed on the mailing list.)
It sounds long and tedious, but it can be done very quickly, if
everybody's used to the process.
It's not a vote, but it is counted and documented. Everyone understands
that it's not sufficient by itself to guarantee the outcome of a policy
decision, because there's also mailing list discussion, by people who
couldn't be present in the room.
There are other ways of doing it, as seen in other RIRs. This is just a
recounting of how it's done in the ARIN region.
-Bill
More information about the RPD
mailing list