Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[AfriNIC-rpd] About the policy BOF

McTim dogwallah at
Tue May 8 06:49:31 UTC 2007

Hi Vincent,

On 5/8/07, Vincent Ngundi <vincent at> wrote:

I agree with you on all of your (elided) points above

> (b) I also think we should come up with a more explicit  way of
> measuring consensus at the open public policy meetings.


This is
> clearly important and is not well addressed in the current PDP.
> Should we measure consensus as a percentage, say 75%, of the total
> number of members who vote in favour of a certain policy proposal?
> Some registries, like APNIC, use a percentage to measure consensus
> and I think this would be a nice idea.

I wasn't aware that APNIC did this, perhaps it's becasue culturally it seems
they have the same issue we do (non-participation by all but a handful of

I would like to see at least training on consensus finding for the WG
chairs, IIRC they did this in the RIPE region few years back.

I'm not sure that voting and setting a hard number (percentage) is the way
to go, but I'm willing to keep an open mind on it.


$ whois -h mctim
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the RPD mailing list