Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[AfriNIC-rpd] AfriNIC Policy Proposal: IPv6 ProviderIndependent (PI) Assignment for End-Sites

JORDI PALET MARTINEZ jordi.palet at consulintel.es
Wed Mar 21 11:24:53 UTC 2007


Hi Vicent, all,

Sorry to heard that :-(

Then the text that I proposed last week should be considered by the staff as
a new version for my previous policy proposal (for end-user-organizations).

People should consider the differences among both, which basically is making
sure that the policy apply only to organizations or also to individuals.

Regards,
Jordi




> De: Vincent Ngundi <vincent at kenic.or.ke>
> Responder a: AfriNIC Resource Policy Discussion List <rpd at afrinic.net>
> Fecha: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 13:31:31 +0300
> Para: AfriNIC Resource Policy Discussion List <rpd at afrinic.net>
> Asunto: [AfriNIC-rpd] AfriNIC Policy Proposal: IPv6 ProviderIndependent (PI)
> Assignment for End-Sites
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> We have decided to incorporate the comments that have been made about
> the above policy. As a result, we have made slight changes to the
> current draft (mainly affecting section 3) to accommodate the same.
> 
> The changes are as follows:
> 
> (a) the new policy _doesn't define the size of the reserved block
> from which the PI v6 assignments shall be made from.
> 
> (b) the new draft _doesn't allow the assignment of prefixes longer
> than /48
> 
> Comments?
> 
> <see re-draft below>
> 
> -v
> 
> 
> #################
> 
> Name  : Vincent Ngundi
> Alain Aina
> Organisation : Kenya Network Information Center - KeNIC
> Policy Affected : 
> Date  :       30th January 2007
> 
> Proposal : IPv6 Provider Independent (PI) Assignment for End-Sites
> Policy Term : Permanent
> 
> Incentive : The current policy does not allow IPv6 provider
> independent (PI) address assignment to any 'end-sites'. In addition,
> lack of IPv6 transport will compel many 'end-sites' to tunnel. Thus,
> to avoid renumbering when IPv6 transport will be available, a
> provider independent assignment seems reasonable. More so, not all
> LIR's have IPv6 address space allocations. This makes it impossible
> for end-users to get PA IPv6 address space from such upstreams
> (LIR's). This policy is also aimed at providing IPv6 address space to
> such end-users as long as they already have or qualify to get PI IPv4
> addresses.
> 
> 
> Introduction
> =========
> 
> This policy allows 'end-sites' to be assigned IPv6 provider
> independent (PI) addresses. 'end-sites' include End-Users who already
> have or qualify to get IPv4 PI addresses and critical Infrastructure
> providers such as TLD root server operators and public Internet
> eXchange Points (IXP's).
> 
> 
> Current Situation
> =============
> 
> AfriNIC has discussed similar proposals recently during it's last two
> Open Policy meetings but both proposals have been returned to the
> public mailing lists for further discussion due to lack of consensus.
> 
> 
> Details
> ======
> 
> (1) Assignment target:
> 
> End-sites which provide Public Internet services for a single
> administrative organisations' network, regardless of their size.
> 
> 
> (2) Assignment criteria:
> 
> * The end-site must not be an IPv6 LIR
> 
> * The end-site must become an AfriNIC End User Member and pay the
> normal AfriNIC fee for its' membership category
> 
> * The end site must either:
>     - be a holder of IPv4 PI address space or
>     - qualify for an IPv4 PI assignment from AfriNIC under the IPv4
> policy currently in effect.
> 
> * The end-site must justify the need for the IPv6 PI address space.
> 
> * The 'end-site' must show a plan to use and announce the IPv6
> provider independent address space within twelve (12) months. After
> that period, if not announced, the assigned IPv6 PI address space
> should be reclaimed and returned to the free pool by AfriNIC.
> 
> (3) Provider Independent (PI) address space:
> 
> * The provider independent (PI) assignment should be made from a
> specific block.
> 
> * The intial provider independent assignment size to an end-site
> should be a /48, or a shorter prefix if the end-site can justify it.
> 
> 
> Effect on AfriNIC
> =============
> No direct effect on the existing AfriNIC members, nor changes to the
> current IPv6 allocation criteria.
> 
> Acknowledgments
> ==============
> Thanks to Adiel Akplogan, Frank Habitch and Jordi Palet for their
> contribution.
> 
> #################
> _______________________________________________
> rpd mailing list
> rpd at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rpd




**********************************************
The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org

Bye 6Bone. Hi, IPv6 !
http://www.ipv6day.org

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.






More information about the RPD mailing list