[AfriNIC-rpd] Re: [resource-policy] AfriNIC Policy Proposal:IPv6ProviderIndependent (PI) Assignment for End-Sites

[Hytham EL Nakhal]

Dear Jordi,
 
No Individuals.
 
Thanks,
Haitham..

________________________________

From: rpd-bounces at afrinic.net on behalf of JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
Sent: Mon 3/19/2007 10:09 AM
To: AfriNIC Resource Policy Discussion List
Subject: Re: [AfriNIC-rpd] Re: [resource-policy] AfriNIC Policy Proposal:IPv6ProviderIndependent (PI) Assignment for End-Sites



Ok, so I guess the point is to ask other people what they think.

Do we want the PI policy for individuals or only organizations ?

Regards,
Jordi




> De: Vincent Ngundi <vincent at kenic.or.ke>
> Responder a: AfriNIC Resource Policy Discussion List <rpd at afrinic.net>
> Fecha: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 09:35:22 +0300
> Para: <aalain at trstech.net>, AfriNIC Resource Policy Discussion List
> <rpd at afrinic.net>
> Asunto: Re: [AfriNIC-rpd] Re: [resource-policy] AfriNIC Policy Proposal:
> IPv6ProviderIndependent (PI) Assignment for End-Sites
>
>
> On Mar 19, 2007, at 12:10 AM, Alain Patrick AINA wrote:
>
>> On Friday 16 March 2007 10:05:40 Vincent Ngundi wrote:
>>> Hi Colleagues,
>>>
>>> I'm sending a copy of Jordi's amendments to the draft policy I
>>> proposed for your consideration.
>>>
>>> Kindly note that the points he intends to alter are as follows:
>>>
>>> (a) changing the word "end-user(s)" to "end-user-organisation(s)"
>>>
>>> (b) changing the assignment target from provides of "Public Internet
>>> services" to providers of "services" thus;
>>>
>>> "End-sites which provide Public Internet services for a single
>>> administrative organisations' network, regardless of their size."
>>>
>>> to
>>>
>>> "End-sites which provide services for a single administrative
>>> organisations' network, regardless of their size."
>>>
>>> (c) There should be no need for assigning a prefix longer than /48;
>>> thus a minimum assignment of a /48 or a shorter prefix if AfriNIC
>>> deems there's justification.
>>
>>
>> it is more than that.
>> d)  changing "end-sites" to end-user-organizations
>>
>> We could open  long discussions on these points, but i think they
>> are not
>> necessary.
>>
>> The initial draft updated with the results on discussions on
>> "boundary"
>> and "size" of  the specific block to be used for the assignments is
>> ok for
>> me.
> I agree with Alain.
>
> -v
>>
>> --alain
>> _______________________________________________
>> rpd mailing list
>> rpd at afrinic.net
>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rpd
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rpd mailing list
> rpd at afrinic.net
> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rpd




**********************************************
The IPv6 Portal: http://www.ipv6tf.org <http://www.ipv6tf.org/> 

Bye 6Bone. Hi, IPv6 !
http://www.ipv6day.org <http://www.ipv6day.org/> 

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the use of the individual(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, including attached files, is prohibited.



_______________________________________________
rpd mailing list
rpd at afrinic.net
https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo.cgi/rpd


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20070319/398c3dd9/attachment.html>