Search RPD Archives
[resource-policy] AfriNIC Policy Proposal: IPv6 ProviderIndependent (PI) Assignment for End-Sites
aa at tenet.ac.za
Tue Jan 30 08:22:26 UTC 2007
I'm ok with all of this except for the following:
* The intial provider independent assignment size to an end-site should
be a /48, or a shorter/longer prefix if the end-site can justify it.
I'm happy with /48s, I'm even happier with bigger blocks, but there
should *NEVER* be a situation where the block is smaller than this in
the global routing tables. If the blocks can ever be smaller than /48
in size it is going to create major BGP filtering headaches.
Can this wording be clarified?
TENET - Chief Technology Officer
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the RPD