Search RPD Archives
Limit search to: Subject & Body Subject Author
Sort by:

[resource-policy] AfriNIC Policy Proposal: IPv6 ProviderIndependent (PI) Assignment for End-Sites

Andrew Alston aa at
Tue Jan 30 08:22:26 UTC 2007

Hi Vincent,


I'm ok with all of this except for the following:


* The intial provider independent assignment size to an end-site should
be a /48, or a shorter/longer prefix if the end-site can justify it.


I'm happy with /48s, I'm even happier with bigger blocks, but there
should *NEVER* be a situation where the block is smaller than this in
the global routing tables.  If the blocks can ever be smaller than /48
in size it is going to create major BGP filtering headaches.


Can this wording be clarified?


Many Thanks


Andrew Alston

TENET - Chief Technology Officer

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <>

More information about the RPD mailing list