[resource-policy] AfriNIC Policy Proposal: IPv6 ProviderIndependent (PI) Assignment for End-Sites

[Andrew Alston]

Hi Vincent,

 

I'm ok with all of this except for the following:

 

* The intial provider independent assignment size to an end-site should
be a /48, or a shorter/longer prefix if the end-site can justify it.

 

I'm happy with /48s, I'm even happier with bigger blocks, but there
should *NEVER* be a situation where the block is smaller than this in
the global routing tables.  If the blocks can ever be smaller than /48
in size it is going to create major BGP filtering headaches.

 

Can this wording be clarified?

 

Many Thanks

 

Andrew Alston

TENET - Chief Technology Officer

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/rpd/attachments/20070130/605f3555/attachment.html>