[policy-wg] Last call for comments on proposed policies
Ernest, B.M (AfriNIC - ZA)
ernest at afrinic.net
Thu Feb 9 11:34:47 SAST 2006
Dear Colleagues,
During the 3rd AfriNIC Public Policy Meeting in Cairo held from 12th
to 13th December 2005, the community consented and voted to forward
the following policy proposals to the AfriNIC Board of Directors for
approval:
o Policy for PI/Direct Assignments to End-User Organisations
http://www.afrinic.net/docs/policies/afpol-v4eu200504.htm
o Temporary Address Assignments / Assignments for Critical
network/internet infrastructure
http://www.afrinic.net/docs/policies/afpol-tmpal200504.htm
o Change to criteria for ASN assignments
http://www.afrinic.net/docs/policies/drafts/afpol-chgasn200508.htm
o IPv6 IANA to RIR allocations
http://www.afrinic.net/docs/policies/drafts/afpol-glbipv6200508.htm
This is a last call for comments from the entire community on these
proposals. After 15 days, the proposed policies above will be
forwarded to the AfriNIC Board for review.
All your comments should be sent to policy-wg at afrinic.net
This last call will expire 15 days from today.
A summary of the face-to-face discussions for each of the above
proposals during the AfriNIC-3 meeting is below:
o Temporary Address Assignments / Assignments for Critical
network/internet infrastructure
http://www.afrinic.net/docs/policies/afpol-tmpal200504.htm
- Concerns about 3.2 (Commercial Use Prohibited) : This
would be difficult to justify by AfriNIC and may involve
some legal issues.
Suggestion was to delete the whole of 3.2 from the
document.
- Questions as to why a temporary assignment cannot be
obtained from the upstream ISP?
Answer was that some ISPs will argue not to have enough
IPs to assign, and that its good practice for all temporary
assignments to come from an RIR block reserved for this
purpose. Other answers were that various upstreams reserve
their prefixes for different products/services, and may
not have a prefix ready for temporary use.
It was agreed that policy be passed only if AfriNIC can
reserve a large block for this purpose.
- Temporary assignments are vulnerable to hi-jacking,
especially when some one 'keeps an eye' on the temporary
assignment and knows its not in use anymore, they will start
using these IPs.
Other comments: whole prefix would be listed
as bogus, hence the need for the RIR to allot another
prefix for temporary assignments.
** Concensus was realized (pending suggested edits)
o Policy for PI/Direct Assignments to End-User Organisations
http://www.afrinic.net/docs/policies/afpol-v4eu200504.htm
- the minimum /24 assignments may have an impact on the
global routing table.
other comments; the routing table is already so saturated
that such small assignmenst wouldnt have such a noticeable
effect.
- APNIC also stated that the minimum is /24 in their region.
- Some people suggested a similar proposal for IPv6.
- replace 5.0, ICANN-sanctioned root, gTLD, and ccTLD ..
with specifics. TLDs were not deemed critical infrastructure
by some, and only IXPs and root servers were proposed.
** Policy realized concensus.
o Change to criteria for ASN assignments
http://www.afrinic.net/docs/policies/drafts/afpol-chgasn200508.htm
** No discussion, policy realized concensus.
o IPv6 IANA to RIR allocations
http://www.afrinic.net/docs/policies/drafts/afpol-glbipv6200508.htm
** No discussion, policy realized concensus.
Please send all your comments to policy-wg at afrinic.net within 15 days
from the date of this last call.
Kind regards,
Ernest
AfriNIC
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3233 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Url : https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/policy-wg/attachments/20060209/197087c0/smime.bin
More information about the policy-wg
mailing list