[Icp2-review] Comments on latest version of ICT-2 draft

[Andrei Robachevsky]

Thank you for clarifying this, Seun,

Regards,

Andrei

Seun Ojedeji wrote on 01/05/2025 19:18:
> Hello Andrei,
>
> Thanks for your response, kindly find inline:
>
> On Thu, 1 May 2025 at 11:27, Andrei Robachevsky 
> <andrei.robachevsky at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>     Dear Seun,
>
>     Thank you for your input.
>
>     Andrei Robachevsky wrote on 28/04/2025 14:11:
>>     Section 2.5  Coordination Limitation
>>     - It will be good to put a wording that clearly states that each
>>     region will have at least a functioning RIR. A wording similar to
>>     below can be added to the statement in section 2.5:
>>     "However each region shall have at least 1 Internet Registry.
>>
>     Yes, this is an important requirement. I think we tried to capture
>     this in the Document under 2.1b: The RIRs jointly operate the
>     Internet Number Registry System. All RIRs shall jointly devote
>     best efforts to ensure that all areas are able to continually
>     receive RIR Services.
>
>     Do you think it addresses your concern?
>
>
> SO: No it doesn't address the concern, Africa region can be said to be 
> receiving RIR service prior to formation of AFRINC but that service 
> was not from the region and that will satisfy the wording under 
> section 2.1b. My suggestion recommends a more intentional effort that 
> ensures an RIR exist in any particular region as we currently know it
>
> Regards
>
>     Regards,
>
>     Andrei Robachevsky
>
>     NRO NC member
>
>
>
> -- 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>     /Seun Ojedeji,
>     /
>
>         Bringing another down does not take you up - think about your
>         action!
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/icp2-review/attachments/20250502/688087a9/attachment-0001.html>