[Icp2-review] Comments on latest version of ICT-2 draft
Seun Ojedeji
seun.ojedeji at gmail.com
Fri Apr 25 13:22:19 UTC 2025
Hello,
I like to suggest 2 minor modifications to the draft:
Section 2.3b Derecognition
- I believe the subject RIR where applicable should be given the
opportunity to transparently respond to the proposal which should then be
put into consideration by the rest of the RIRs in their decision making
prior to it getting to ICANN level. The opportunity given under section
2.3c(i) would rather be a second attempt and not the first and only. So i
suggest a wording similar to below:
"Where applicable the subject RIR may provide a response within 7 days of
publication of the proposal on why it should not be derecognised"
This needs to occur prior to section 2bii
Section 2.5 Coordination Limitation
- It will be good to put a wording that clearly states that each region
will have at least a functioning RIR. A wording similar to below can be
added to the statement in section 2.5:
"However each region shall have at least 1 Internet Registry.
Alternatively. A new line can be introduced under section 2.3b with wording
similar to below:
"Should the subject RIR be derecognised, effort shall be made by the rest
of the RIRs and ICANN to ensure a new entity from within the region is
promptly recognised
to serve the region affected"
A timeline can also be added to the above text if necessary.
Regards
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*Seun Ojedeji,*
Bringing another down does not take you up - think about your action!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/icp2-review/attachments/20250425/d504f53a/attachment.html>
More information about the ICP2-Review
mailing list