[Icann-aswg] Re: [governance] ICANN Africa Strategy

[Nii Quaynor]

Alice,

Thanks. Rafik is fine. GNSO includes registrars....

Bill Drakes asks for the world and uses bad language 'exclusive' to get people against rather than noting that NCUC members can contribute by participation in the process

If we wanted every constituency represented it will be larger than current group of 9?

Any ideas how to proceed?
Best
Nii

On Sep 14, 2012, at 15:13, Alice Munyua <alice at apc.org> wrote:

> Hi Nii and all
> See below comment about gNSO representation.
> 
> best regards
> Alice
> 
> 
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject:	Re: [governance] ICANN Africa Strategy
> Date:	Fri, 14 Sep 2012 17:07:49 +0200
> From:	William Drake <william.drake at uzh.ch>
> To:	Alice Munyua <alice at apc.org>
> 
> 
>  
> Core community nominated in Prague
> Maimouna Diop Diagne - (GAC, West Africa)
> Palesa Legoze - (GAC, Southern AFrica)
> Pierre Dandjinou - (atLarge/ASO, West Africa)
> Nii Quaynor - (ICANN Board Alumni/atLarge/ccNSO/ASO, West Africa)
> Regional/Constituency nomination
> Alice Munyua - (GAC, East Africa)
> Barrack Ong'ondo Otieno (ccNSO, East Africa)
> Mouhamet Diop - (ICANN Board Alumni/ASO/gNSO, West Africa) 
> Tijani Ben Jemaa - (atLarge, North Africa)
> Michel CAPDA - (atLarge, Central Africa) 
> 
> 
> Why so exclusive?  No GNSO/NCUC representation?  Rafik would be good for this, some of our other members as well…
> 
> BD
> 
> 
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/icann-aswg/attachments/20120914/44bfd64e/attachment.htm