[IANAOversight] Fwd: Re: [IANA-issues] Fwd: [Internal-cg] Fwd: Procedural Issue

[Seun Ojedeji]

Fyi

sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: "Seun Ojedeji" <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>
Date: 9 Oct 2014 18:23
Subject: Re: [IANA-issues] Fwd: [Internal-cg] Fwd: Procedural Issue
To: "JEAN-JACQUES SUBRENAT" <jjs at dyalog.net>
Cc: "IANA Issues" <iana-issues at atlarge-lists.icann.org>

Hi JJ,

For all it's worth, this was also my view and understanding since the
beginning which I also echoed on a number of lists.

It's good that NTIA has formerly clarified this, although I wonder why they
had to wait this long.

Cheers!

sent from Google nexus 4
kindly excuse brevity and typos.
On 9 Oct 2014 17:40, "Subrenat, Jean-Jacques" <jjs at dyalog.net> wrote:

> Dear Colleagues,
>
> the Chair of the ICG has just forwarded to the ICG membership the email
> from NTIA about the transmission of the transition plan (see below).
>
> Best regards,
> Jean-Jacques.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Mail transféré -----
> De: "Alissa Cooper" <alissa at cooperw.in>
> À: "ICG" <internal-cg at icann.org>
> Envoyé: Jeudi 9 Octobre 2014 23:18:30
> Objet: [Internal-cg] Fwd: Procedural Issue
>
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Fiona Alexander < FAlexander at ntia.doc.gov >
>
> Subject: Procedural Issue
>
> Date: October 7, 2014 at 12:18:30 PM PDT
>
> To: " Alissa at cooperw.in " < Alissa at cooperw.in >
>
> Cc: Ashley Heineman < AHeineman at ntia.doc.gov >
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi Alissa
>
> I hope things are well. We at NTIA wanted to once again thank you and the
> members of the ICG for all your hard work. NTIA is actively monitoring
> things and took note of the process time line posted by the ICG on Sept 8
> th . We wanted to alert you now that we see a procedural issue with “step
> 7” as proposed. As articulated in our March announcement, we asked ICANN as
> the both IANA functions contractor and the global coordinator for the DNS
> to convene the multistakeholder process to develop the transition plan.
> (See:
> http://www.ntia.doc.gov/press-release/2014/ntia-announces-intent-transition-key-internet-domain-name-functions
> ). This means as practical matter and consistent with procurement rules,
> ICANN must be the part that formally submits the transition proposal to
> NTIA. While not a substantive concern, we wanted to flag this procedural
> issue now so that it can be addressed by the ICG and ICANN well in advance.
>
> Thank you
>
> Fiona
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Fiona M. Alexander
> Associate Administrator for International Affairs
> National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA)
> (202) 482-1866
> www.ntia.doc.gov
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Internal-cg mailing list
> Internal-cg at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/internal-cg
>
> _______________________________________________
> Iana-issues mailing list
> Iana-issues at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/iana-issues
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/ianaoversight/attachments/20141009/9e5280c4/attachment.htm