[DBWG] person without email... and domain object size

[Ben Maddison]

Hi Simon, all,

On 09/07, Simon Seruyinda wrote:

> Hi Frank,

> 

> <snip/>

> 

> Regarding the rdns objects size, thanks for bringing this up for discussion. Currently we have a limit for IPv4 set to minimum of /24, but there is no limit implemented for IPv6, so it will go up to 128.

> I agree this could lead to unnecessary db growth and i think a limit should be set. Input from the DBWG members on what would be the appropriate minimum would highly be appreciated.

> 

I would align with the minimum allocation size (/48, right?).
It's conceivable that a resource holder might want to delegate down
further, but that, I believe, should be a task for the operator's
nameservers.

Cheers,

Ben
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.afrinic.net/pipermail/dbwg/attachments/20200907/87f51483/attachment.sig>