[DBWG] person without email... and domain object size

[Frank Habicht]

again...

I can't see domain objects for longer/smaller prefixes than /24 in IPv4.

Frank

On 06/09/2020 21:33, Frank Habicht wrote:

> I forgot to mention that there are a total of 9 reverse-DNS delegations

> for /128 prefixes.

> 

> the 2nd one I checked was not lame.

> didn't check more.

> 

> 

> domain:

> 0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.1.0.0.0.0.0.f.f.f.0.c.2.ip6.arpa

> domain:

> 0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.f.f.f.0.c.2.ip6.arpa

> domain:

> b.3.3.0.f.4.e.f.f.f.3.4.3.c.4.9.0.0.0.0.0.0.2.2.8.e.4.f.f.0.c.2.ip6.arpa

> domain:

> 0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.8.b.3.4.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa

> domain:

> 0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.8.2.a.f.f.0.c.2.ip6.arpa

> domain:

> 0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.8.8.2.a.f.f.0.c.2.ip6.arpa

> domain:

> 0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.8.b.2.f.f.0.c.2.ip6.arpa

> domain:

> 0.1.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.1.0.0.8.f.3.4.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa

> domain:

> 0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.d.6.f.f.0.c.2.ip6.arpa

> 

> 

> PS: that's from an FTP database from August 20th.

> 

> Frank

> 

> 

> On 06/09/2020 21:22, Frank Habicht wrote:

>> Hi AfriNIC staff,

>>

>> since when is the 'e-mail:' attribute for 'person' objects mandatory?

>>

>> I just found

>> nic-hdl:        SE1-AFRINIC

>> that does not have an email.

>>

>> It's got a GENERATED maintainer, and I'm also wondering how these new

>> maintainer credentials were communicated to the "person".

>>

>> Yes, I don't want to rely on 'changed:' attributes.

>>

>> Staff:

>> How many 'person' objects don't have an 'e-mail:' attribute ?

>>

>>

>> [slowly getting to another issue....]

>>

>> Why did I get to check this person object at all....?

>>

>> Because in a domain object it is

>> tech-c:         SE1-AFRINIC

>> zone-c:         SE1-AFRINIC

>>

>>

>> Also, the domain object is since "2020-02-02 02:02"

>> ( nice time stamp!! ;-) ) marked as all 'nserver' being *lame*.

>> So when is it meant to get deleted?

>> I hope we're not waiting for the tech-c or zone-c to respond to the

>> email, which we could not send, because the 'person' doesn't have an

>> email address?

>>

>> But what really got me to check the domain object:

>>

>> domain:

>> 0.1.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.1.0.0.8.f.3.4.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa

>>

>> yes, it's a bit long. a reverse DNS delegation for a /128

>>

>> This is probably "legal".

>> But:

>> a) if disputable 'usefulness', and

>> b) I see "tremendous' potential for growth in the DB - in a bad way

>>

>>

>> All, Staff and WG:

>>

>> should creation of domain objects be limited to certain prefix sizes?

>>

>>

>> Thanks,

>> Frank

>>

>> _______________________________________________

>> DBWG mailing list

>> DBWG at afrinic.net

>> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/dbwg

>>

> 

> _______________________________________________

> DBWG mailing list

> DBWG at afrinic.net

> https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/dbwg

>