<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252">
</head>
<body>
<div dir="ltr" style="">
<div style=""></div>
<div style="">
<div>
<div dir="ltr">There have been no bylaw updates as concerns this - I checked. This is an entirely arbitrary requirement and as per the CEOs email - was decided by the logistics team - which drastically exceeds the authority of a logistics team when it comes
into conflict with the rights of members<span></span></div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">What AfriNIC is effectively doing is denying members the right - among other things - to have legal council present and interacting - it’s a very very dangerous move and I will be quite curious to see how the court reacts to such an arbitrary
stipulation specified just days before a meeting - considering long standing precedent and the fact that no such restrictions exist in either the bylaws or section 115 of the companies act</div>
<div dir="ltr"><br>
</div>
<div dir="ltr">Andrew </div>
<div id="ms-outlook-mobile-signature">
<div><br>
</div>
Get <a href="https://aka.ms/o0ukef" style="">Outlook for iOS</a></div>
</div>
<div> </div>
<hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%" tabindex="-1">
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif"><b>From:</b> Ish Sookun <ish.sookun@lasentinelle.mu><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, June 1, 2022 21:27<br>
<b>To:</b> Andrew Alston <Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com><br>
<b>Cc:</b> AFRINIC Communication <comms@afrinic.net>; AFRINIC Community Discuss <community-discuss@afrinic.net>; legal@afrinic.net <legal@afrinic.net>; members-discuss@afrinic.net <members-discuss@afrinic.net><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [members-discuss] ATTENDANCE & PARTICIPATION AT THE ANNUAL GENERAL MEMBERS’ MEETING (AGMM)
<div> </div>
</font></div>
Hi Andrew, AFRINIC Comms & Legal,
<div><br class="">
<blockquote type="cite" class="">
<div class="">On 1 Jun 2022, at 22:14, Andrew Alston <<a href="mailto:Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com" class="" style="">Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com</a>> wrote:</div>
<br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
<div class="">
<div dir="ltr" class="" style="caret-color:rgb(0,0,0); font-family:Helvetica; font-size:12px; font-style:normal; font-variant-caps:normal; font-weight:400; letter-spacing:normal; text-align:start; text-indent:0px; text-transform:none; white-space:normal; word-spacing:0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width:0px; text-decoration:none">
Why is there a restriction on multiple members from the same organization attending online - as stated we understand the physical restrictions - but the online restriction does not make sense.</div>
<br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br class="">
<div class="">Yes, indeed.</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">Besides I do not think this restriction, on online attendance, was applied in previous meetings. There hasn’t been any amendment to that particular article of the Bylaws between Kampala and now, unless I am wrong. Therefore, why the restriction
on online attendance, now? Asking one member of the organisation to join the meeting platform and the other to watch on YouTube.</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">Regards,</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">
<div>———</div>
<div><br class="">
</div>
<div>Ish Sookun</div>
<div><br class="">
</div>
<div>Systems Architect @ La Sentinelle Ltd</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>