<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<br>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 8/Nov/19 05:54, Ali Hussein wrote:<br>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAPjmBy2NSS21o6LdHyBnv0RLQtuUeLdC0u15MsvWRk3K=RUq6w@mail.gmail.com">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr"><br>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif">Your
points are noted. Let me make one or two points clear.</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif"><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif">1.
There is a clear separation of duties between executive and
board. I'm not suggesting that the Board usurp the role of
the CEO. Or vice versa. I'm simply saying there are issues
that the CEO CANNOT purport to speak for the board. This is
basic corporate governance 1o1. For example, if there's an
issue with the NomComm or HR & Governance committee
pertaining to the conduct of a senior executive or the CEO
himself, there will be a clear conflict for the CEO to
address such matters. </div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif"><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif">2.
If the community is unclear between the roles of the Board
and the CEO then I suggest that they read up on this and/or
Afrinic endeavors to capacity build the community on the
same.</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
I think it would not be unreasonable for the CEO to give us a simple
summary of when we should expect to hear from the Board in lieu of
him. <br>
<br>
The membership could read the bylaws about this, but I imagine a
simple message from the CEO will provide more clarity than wading
the wording.<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAPjmBy2NSS21o6LdHyBnv0RLQtuUeLdC0u15MsvWRk3K=RUq6w@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif"><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif">A
board that is detached from the rest of the organization,
seemingly like they are some demi-gods, is one of the
reasons that companies lose their way..There's a fine
balance between 'interference' and 'neglect'. We must ensure
that Afrinic doesn't suffer from this.</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
You are interpreting my comments about my organization's Board as
them being detached from the organization. That is not what I said,
and you are welcome to re-read my e-mail.<br>
<br>
I said my staff (the ones that report to me) would not typically be
involved with the Board. However, I, and upper management, are more
likely to be involved with the Board. I'm sure you get this.<br>
<br>
The depth of structure of an RIR's governance is a lot simpler than
that of an organization such as ours, i.e., the membership are more
likely to run into and interact with the Board as a matter of course
than, say, all the staff at a highly structured organization would
theirs. <br>
<br>
So no, I'm not advocating that AFRINIC members do not speak to the
Board, and I am sure you know that.<br>
<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAPjmBy2NSS21o6LdHyBnv0RLQtuUeLdC0u15MsvWRk3K=RUq6w@mail.gmail.com">
<div dir="ltr">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif"><br>
</div>
<div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:georgia,serif">One
last point. The chairperson of a board is supposed to
represent the board in such matters. Not the CEO. This MUST
be made clear. Board matters are Board matters. He/she is
First Among Equals. <br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Again, grateful if the CEO can dumb it down for us. <br>
<br>
I could read it for myself, but in the interest of the avoidance of
any doubt, nothing beats the horse's mouth. I'm getting old and
lazy, so this sort of thing is helpful.<br>
<br>
Mark.<br>
</body>
</html>