<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class="">Hi Ish<br class=""><div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On 11 Jun 2019, at 12:55, Ish Sookun <<a href="mailto:ish.sookun@lasentinelle.mu" class="">ish.sookun@lasentinelle.mu</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div class="">Hi Mike,<br class=""><br class="">On 6/11/19 1:03 PM, Mike Silber wrote:<br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">By agreeing to become a director of a company one expressly and implicitly consents to the publication of personal information in the context of the company.<br class=""><br class=""></blockquote><br class="">The "context of the company" is a vague statement.<br class=""><br class="">The DPA is strict on the fact & stresses that information collected,<br class="">processed & stored are for specific use & period, and the person has the<br class="">right to object to use of that information.<br class=""><br class="">Could you point me to any documentation by AFRINIC Ltd that specifies<br class="">that when becoming a director one "expressly and implicitly consents to<br class="">the publication of personal information”.<br class=""></div></div></blockquote><div><br class=""></div>No - but I can point you to the Companies Act as well as form <span style="font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 15px;" class="">S23-F10 and Section 23 of the DPA</span></div><div><br class=""></div><div><font face="Helvetica" class=""><span style="font-size: 15px;" class="">I suggest you raise your concern with the Corporate and Business Registration Department and not with AfriNIC, this community or myself.</span></font></div><div><br class=""></div><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class=""><div class=""><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class="">There is no suggestion that the consent related to the publication of the person’s address (which was redacted in any event) but the use of his name.<br class=""></blockquote><br class="">I understood that the person raised that no decision was taken with<br class="">regards to the publication of personal data. The minutes do not refer to<br class="">the use of the person's name.<br class=""><br class=""></div></div></blockquote><div><br class=""></div><div>This is illogical, as ALL addresses were redacted. Maybe the minutes are inaccurate?</div><div><br class=""></div>Mike</div><div><br class=""></div></body></html>