<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">On Dec 12, 2018, at 02:38 , Chevalier du Borg <<a href="mailto:virtual.borg@gmail.com" class="">virtual.borg@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><div dir="ltr" style="caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration: none;" class=""><div dir="ltr" class=""><br class=""><br class=""><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="">Le mar. 11 déc. 2018 à 19:41, Andrew Alston <<a href="mailto:Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com" class="">Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com</a>> a écrit :<br class=""></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; border-left-width: 1px; border-left-style: solid; border-left-color: rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><div lang="EN-US" class=""><div class="gmail-m_7637421601715174592WordSection1"><ul type="disc" style="margin-top: 0cm;" class=""><li class="gmail-m_7637421601715174592MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left: 0cm;">If OIF were try to put french citizen people on AFRINIC board, your argument will make sense. It is not. If you have evidence to show it has, please share and tell us how they benefit from it.<u class=""></u><u class=""></u></li></ul><div class=""><p class="MsoNormal"><u class=""></u> <u class=""></u></p><p class="MsoNormal">Actually this claim concerns me more than anything and highlights everything I believe is wrong with this policy in the first place. Firstly it assumes facts not yet in evidence – because any “benefit” would assume that<u class=""></u><u class=""></u></p><p class="MsoNormal"><u class=""></u> <u class=""></u></p><ol start="1" type="a" style="margin-top: 0cm;" class=""><li class="gmail-m_7637421601715174592MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left: 18pt;">There is sufficient evidence to use this policy against Larus at the request of a member initiated review – there is no evidence of this<u class=""></u><u class=""></u></li><li class="gmail-m_7637421601715174592MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left: 18pt;">Failing (a) it assumes that Larus will some how come up in “random” review – which would be far from random<u class=""></u><u class=""></u></li><li class="gmail-m_7637421601715174592MsoListParagraph" style="margin-left: 18pt;">As regards (a) it assumes that there even if a review were done against Larus that there would be any finding of guilty<u class=""></u><u class=""></u></li></ol><p class="MsoNormal"><u class=""></u> <u class=""></u></p><p class="MsoNormal">Since none of those things have been proven nor has any evidence been shown – and in fact AFRINIC has repeatedly stated that those applications for space were thoroughly reviewed and vetted – I fail to see how you can claim benefit.</p></div></div></div></blockquote><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">You still avoid how OIF and a member are equivalent. They are not. A member can potentially benefit or suffer from this proposal - not so OIF. That the point.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">As to everything having been review and ok by AFRINIC, please note that every one of the multinational company that rape this continent usually obey the LETTER of the law.</div></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br class=""></div></div>Then make better laws.<div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">The review policy won’t solve the problem you have stated here.</div><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Owen</div><div class=""><br class=""></div></body></html>