<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div></div><div><br></div><div><br>On Jun 7, 2018, at 07:45, Omo Oaiya <<a href="mailto:Omo.Oaiya@wacren.net">Omo.Oaiya@wacren.net</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div><div class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div><br></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div><div class="gmail_quote">On 7 June 2018 at 15:16, Owen DeLong <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:owen@delong.com" target="_blank">owen@delong.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="auto"><div></div><div>The result is not broken. The guidelines need to be improved to avoid the potential for the proposed alternate and illogical conclusion and provide greater clarity. </div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I marvel at your logic. The result was derived form same guidelines that have potential for illogical conclusion and insufficient clarity yet it is not broken? </div></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div>There is one logical interpretation of the guidelines. The result is conformance to that interpretation. <div><br></div><div>There are alternative interpretations which meet the literal guidelines, but which come to illogical conclusions. Additional clarity in the guidelines could eliminate the possibility that those interpretations could be considered legitimate. </div><div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="auto"><div><br></div><div>That can be achieved without further answers from board, legal, or CEO. I realize that doesn’t provide the outcome that those who proposed this illogical (albeit literal) alternative interpretation were hoping for, but it is the only rational outcome. </div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I think you let the board, legal or CEO respond to this before AFRINIC is subjected to unneccessary legal exposure</div></div></div></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div>I’ve done nothing to prevent them from responding. I’ve merely suggested that the community’s effort would be better spent improving the guidelines vs. whining about the current situation and asking board/CEO/legal to say more than has already been said by Ashok. </div><div><br></div><div>Owen</div><div><br><blockquote type="cite"><div><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_extra"><div class="gmail_quote"><div><br></div><div>Omo</div><div><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="auto"><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><div><br></div><div>Owen</div></font></span><div><div class="h5"><div><br></div><div><br>On Jun 7, 2018, at 06:34, Noah <<a href="mailto:noah@neo.co.tz" target="_blank">noah@neo.co.tz</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div dir="ltr"><div dir="auto"><div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Thu, 7 Jun 2018, 12:44 p.m. Ben Roberts, <<a href="mailto:Ben.Roberts@liquidtelecom.com" target="_blank">Ben.Roberts@liquidtelecom.com</a><wbr>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div dir="auto">
But isn’t this an academic discussion?
<div><br>
</div>
<div>I’m not seeing any of the candidates that were rejected by majority by the members raising any requests to appeal?<br></div></div></blockquote></div></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">We have major issues that need answers in order to fix the flaws that are apparently being avoided by those tasked with answers.<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">If the board or the CEO or the legal counsel dodges answering some of this questions then how shall we fix what is clearly broken.</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Noah</div><div dir="auto"><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="auto"><div><blockquote type="cite"><div><div dir="auto">
<div dir="auto">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div link="blue" vlink="purple" lang="EN-US">
<div class="m_-8607803756897175952m_3265099435035641301m_9215834574612863920m_1119675033684136254WordSection1">
<div>
<div></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote></div></div></div>
</div>
</div></blockquote></div></div></div><br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Community-Discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Community-Discuss@afrinic.net">Community-Discuss@afrinic.net</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.afrinic.net/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/community-<wbr>discuss</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div></div>
</div></blockquote></div></body></html>