<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Title" content="">
<meta name="Keywords" content="">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
p
{mso-style-priority:99;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0cm;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0cm;
font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman";}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:Calibri;
color:windowtext;}
span.msoIns
{mso-style-type:export-only;
mso-style-name:"";
text-decoration:underline;
color:teal;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:595.0pt 842.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style>
</head>
<body bgcolor="white" lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">What ethical considerations Omo?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">I’m confused here – what is not ethical about a person saying “Here is my proxy, I trust you to vote with it, either in a particular way, or because I trust your judgement”<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><br>
What is not ethical about accepting to be a voice for someone who feels that they want to be heard and that is the method of being heard that they choose?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Please – explain this ethical dilemma to me – because I just don’t get it<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri">Andrew<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:Calibri"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-family:Calibri;color:black">From: </span>
</b><span style="font-family:Calibri;color:black">Omo Oaiya <Omo.Oaiya@wacren.net><br>
<b>Date: </b>Wednesday, 5 October 2016 at 10:16<br>
<b>To: </b>Andrew Alston <Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com><br>
<b>Cc: </b>General Discussions of AFRINIC <community-discuss@afrinic.net>, Noah <noah@neo.co.tz>, Hytham El-Nakhal <hytham@tra.gov.eg><br>
<b>Subject: </b>Re: [Community-Discuss] Accountability assessment - quorum<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<p>On 5 Oct 2016 7:54 a.m., "Andrew Alston" <<a href="mailto:Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com">Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com</a>> wrote:<br>
><br>
> I certainly don’t. Who are we to dictate to people who they trust? <br>
><o:p></o:p></p>
<p>People are welcome to whom they trust. The interest is the integrity of the voting process and avoiding proxy abuse.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p>><br>
> Or do we somehow claim to be know better than the members and we believe they aren’t smart enough to make their own decisions?<br>
><o:p></o:p></p>
<p style="margin-bottom:12.0pt">I am amazed at the apparent disregard of the ethical considerations by board members whether in personal capacity or not.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p>> <br>
><br>
> Andrew<br>
><br>
> <br>
><br>
> <br>
><br>
> From: Noah <<a href="mailto:noah@neo.co.tz">noah@neo.co.tz</a>><br>
> Date: Wednesday, 5 October 2016 at 09:39<br>
> To: Hytham El-Nakhal <<a href="mailto:hytham@tra.gov.eg">hytham@tra.gov.eg</a>><br>
> Cc: General Discussions of AFRINIC <<a href="mailto:community-discuss@afrinic.net">community-discuss@afrinic.net</a>><br>
> Subject: Re: [Community-Discuss] Accountability assessment - quorum<br>
><br>
> <br>
><br>
> On 4 Oct 2016 22:12, "Hytham El-Nakhal" <<a href="mailto:hytham@tra.gov.eg">hytham@tra.gov.eg</a>> wrote:<br>
> > <br>
> > (if 100 members trust one specific member so they all have equal rights to issue a proxy for him).<br>
> ><br>
><br>
> Really....... and you dont see this as a problem.<br>
><br>
> > Thanks,<br>
> > Haitham<br>
><br>
> Noah<br>
><br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> Community-Discuss mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Community-Discuss@afrinic.net">Community-Discuss@afrinic.net</a><br>
> <a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss">https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss</a><br>
><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>