<div dir="ltr">Hello All,<div><br></div><div>Comments are inline<br><div class="gmail_extra"><br clear="all"><div><div class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div dir="ltr"><div><div>Honest Ornella GANKPA<br></div></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div href="http://WISESTAMP_SIG_gmail_session"></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div></div>
<br><div class="gmail_quote">2016-10-05 1:56 GMT+01:00 Hountomey Jean Robert <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jrhountomey@gmail.com" target="_blank">jrhountomey@gmail.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><p class="MsoNormal">Excuses me but this discussion should be handled in a different way. It
should be more structured for a serious matter of business at that level. AfriNIC does have a history and there is a
reason where the limit was put there, why the number 5 and also why electronic voting
was introduced. <span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br></p><p class="MsoNormal">Having said that:<span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">(1). I do remember that Legal has always been called
for advice. Now Legal also disagree.<span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><br></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">(2). Where are the minutes from the previous
meetings when we
made those decisions and why are we discussing a so serious business matter
affecting AfriNIC this way?<span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br></p></div></blockquote><div>I fully agree with Jean-Robert. The entire community (especially newer members) would benefits from reading</div><div>those minutes of meeting. It would give everyone a clear understanding as to why proxies limit was voted in the first place.</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><p class="MsoNormal"></p><p class="MsoNormal">(3). Now that there are under the “assumption of legal
mistake” made by the community with the blessing of our Legal, the CEO and the Board, the best way would have been to conduct a due diligence process gathering
all the facts, weighting the pros and cons including how we make sure to limit disagreements, what controls can be put in place etc. Board you should have done that before we move further in the discussion. Then a report should have been
presented to the community for informed decisions.</p></div></blockquote><div> </div><div>Agreed. However it is not too late. This could be a priority topic for the governance commitee</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><p class="MsoNormal"><span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">(4). In another world, with board
members standing against a process that has elected them, with the support of the CEO and legal, they
should have step down until we reached a consensus and organize new elections.</p></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I support this proposal as well. We either go all out to fix the process or there is nothing to fix there (that is proxies limit) and everyone shall move on and focus on other matters</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><p class="MsoNormal"><span></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><br></p><p class="MsoNormal">I suggest that we don't proceed backwards until we find the best way that strengthen the AfriNIC that is dear to all of us.</p><span class="gmail-HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><p class="MsoNormal"><br></p><p class="MsoNormal">Jean-Robert.</p></font></span><div><div class="gmail-h5"><p class="MsoNormal"> </p><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">2016-10-04 13:26 GMT-07:00 Boubakar Barry <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:boubakarbarry@gmail.com" target="_blank">boubakarbarry@gmail.com</a>></span>:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr"><div><div>I said it was the last thing I will say on this.<br><br></div>This is not a one to one dialogue and I will elaborate on this very trivial issue only if other members of the community think that what I have posted on this issue is not clear enough.<span class="gmail-m_-7712747900848912019HOEnZb"><font color="#888888"><br><br></font></span></div><span class="gmail-m_-7712747900848912019HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">Boubakar<br><br></font></span></div><div class="gmail-m_-7712747900848912019HOEnZb"><div class="gmail-m_-7712747900848912019h5"><div class="gmail_extra"><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 8:04 PM, Andrew Alston <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com" target="_blank">Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.c<wbr>om</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="white" lang="EN-US">
<div class="gmail-m_-7712747900848912019m_1364916431531540636m_-4407472631578634565WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:calibri">Sorry – But what you are saying here still does not make sense to me, and I really would like to understand your argument better.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:calibri">You are saying that limiting proxies limits vote buying because someone can buy a signed piece of paper – ok – now lets look at electronic voting…<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:calibri">What is preventing someone from paying someone to not look at the candidates at all and log in, and say “vote for this person” – absolutely nothing – the same thing occurs.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:calibri">Personally I don’t believe that there is any situation where buying votes in the context of AfriNIC would make any sense whatsoever and I just don’t see it ever happening – but if we want
to be paranoid and protect against it – limiting proxies certainly won’t do that.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:calibri">Andrew<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:calibri"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<div style="border-right:none;border-bottom:none;border-left:none;border-top:1pt solid rgb(181,196,223);padding:3pt 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-family:calibri;color:black">From: </span>
</b><span style="font-family:calibri;color:black">Boubakar Barry <<a href="mailto:boubakarbarry@gmail.com" target="_blank">boubakarbarry@gmail.com</a>><br>
<b>Date: </b>Tuesday, 4 October 2016 at 23:00<br>
<b>To: </b>Andrew Alston <<a href="mailto:Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com" target="_blank">Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.c<wbr>om</a>><br>
<b>Cc: </b>Hytham El-Nakhal <<a href="mailto:hytham@tra.gov.eg" target="_blank">hytham@tra.gov.eg</a>>, "<a href="mailto:community-discuss@afrinic.net" target="_blank">community-discuss@afrinic.net</a><wbr>" <<a href="mailto:community-discuss@afrinic.net" target="_blank">community-discuss@afrinic.net</a><wbr>></span></p><div><div class="gmail-m_-7712747900848912019m_1364916431531540636h5"><br>
<b>Subject: </b>Re: [Community-Discuss] Accountability assessment - quorum<u></u><u></u></div></div><p></p>
</div><div><div class="gmail-m_-7712747900848912019m_1364916431531540636h5">
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12pt">To be honest, I just read the beginning of your email. Many other important things to do.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12pt">Just to say: for a resource member who really doesn't care about how AfriNIC is managed/governed and just wants to get its resources (and there is a load of them if you look at meetings attendance and participation
in the mailing lists), it makes a huge difference between looking at candidates profiles before logging in to vote and signing a pre-filled form.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12pt">My last 2 cents on this. Members and the community should decide.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12pt">B.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 7:53 PM, Andrew Alston <<a href="mailto:Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com" target="_blank">Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.c<wbr>om</a>> wrote:<u></u><u></u></p>
<blockquote style="border-top:none;border-right:none;border-bottom:none;border-left:1pt solid rgb(204,204,204);padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 6pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0cm">
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:calibri">Speaking in my own personal capacity.</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:calibri"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:calibri">Firstly – You don’t eliminate the risk of bought votes by limiting proxies – it makes absolutely zero difference – because the
person could just as easily pay someone to vote a particular way electronically.</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:calibri"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:calibri">Secondly – The reason that people give others proxies is often more than just votes – the voting aspect of it is just another
element of the proxy that can be exercised at the same time. Companies may well want their voices heard at an AGMM that they cannot be present at – so they issue a proxy and the individual carrying the proxy then speaks on their behalf *<b>AND</b>* votes
on their behalf</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:calibri"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:calibri">Thirdly – If we determine that the current wording in the bylaws is invalid or out of sync with the act or has giant problems
with it – the only way to fix that is to the fix the bylaws – and calling for this to be fixed won’t help until someone actually proposes new wording to fix the issue – and then sees if it will get the majority that is required for the bylaw change. Personally,
having read the responses on this list – I do not see a consensus for a proxy limitation at all – so I have my personal doubts that such a bylaw change would succeed – but it is still the only way to actually rectify the problem. (Due to the fact that for
all the reasons I have stated, even if we take the act out of the picture, the current bylaw limit is in my view invalid since proxies aren’t granted to members, they are granted to individuals).</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:calibri"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:calibri">Note: I personally will have zero issue if someone attempts to put a special resolution for anything on the floor – and I would
encourage people who really believe that this is limit SHOULD be there to do exactly that – attempt to fix the wording in the bylaws such that there is actually a legitimate limit. I just doubt it would pass a 75% majority based on what I have seen on this
list so far – where I see absolutely no consensus for such a limit.</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:calibri"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:calibri">Andrew</span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:calibri"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:calibri"> </span><u></u><u></u></p>
<div style="border-right:none;border-bottom:none;border-left:none;border-top:1pt solid rgb(181,196,223);padding:3pt 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-family:calibri;color:black">From:
</span></b><span style="font-family:calibri;color:black">Boubakar Barry <<a href="mailto:boubakarbarry@gmail.com" target="_blank">boubakarbarry@gmail.com</a>><br>
<b>Date: </b>Tuesday, 4 October 2016 at 22:44<br>
<b>To: </b>Hytham El-Nakhal <<a href="mailto:hytham@tra.gov.eg" target="_blank">hytham@tra.gov.eg</a>><br>
<b>Cc: </b>"<a href="mailto:community-discuss@afrinic.net" target="_blank">community-discuss@afrinic.net</a><wbr>" <<a href="mailto:community-discuss@afrinic.net" target="_blank">community-discuss@afrinic.net</a><wbr>></span><u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
<b>Subject: </b>Re: [Community-Discuss] Accountability assessment - quorum<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12pt">In many countries, and not only in Africa, people buy votes and/or vote differently than instructed.
<br>
<br>
By limiting the number of proxies one can carry, we won't eliminate this risk, but we would at least reduce it.<br>
<br>
I don't understand the logic whereby somebody trusts a third party more than him/herself? What is the electronic voting facility for?<br>
<br>
Yes, I know some will say everybody should be given the right to vote the way he/she wants (paper ballot paper onsite, electronic voting or proxy). No problem with that.
<br>
<br>
But let's limit the risks by limiting the number of proxies one eligible voter can carry. There were good reasons for putting the limit.<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12pt">Boubakar<u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 7:07 PM, Hytham El-Nakhal <<a href="mailto:hytham@tra.gov.eg" target="_blank">hytham@tra.gov.eg</a>> wrote:<u></u><u></u></p>
<blockquote style="border-top:none;border-right:none;border-bottom:none;border-left:1pt solid rgb(204,204,204);padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 6pt;margin:5pt 0cm 5pt 4.8pt">
<p class="MsoNormal">"Talking as a community member in my personal capacity"<br>
<br>
+1 Mark,<br>
I support the freedom for member to choose the way to cast his vote and to remove the restriction on the total number of proxies that one member can carry (if 100 members trust one specific member so they all have equal rights to issue a proxy for him).<br>
I understand that this restriction is applied only for members who has the right to vote in the meeting as per article 12.12.viii , and not applied on non-member person who assigned as a proxy by members as per item 12.12.i & ii & vii the member is free to
choose anyone as a proxy, I'm not a lawyer but just read the articles of AFRINIC bylaws.<br>
<br>
Thanks,<br>
Haitham<br>
______________________________<wbr>__________<br>
From: Mark Elkins <<a href="mailto:mje@posix.co.za" target="_blank">mje@posix.co.za</a>><br>
Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 7:54 PM<br>
To: <a href="mailto:community-discuss@afrinic.net" target="_blank">community-discuss@afrinic.net</a><br>
Subject: Re: [Community-Discuss] Accountability assessment - quorum<u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
I don't think the Proxy issue would survive a legal challenge in any<br>
African country based on English (or Dutch) law.<br>
<br>
French law can be different but this is law about how a company operates<br>
and with a few minor exceptions (eg company stamps) - I'd expect this to<br>
be very similar the world over.<br>
<br>
I personally prefer freedom for the individual member to choose the way<br>
in which they want to vote, whether in person, via proxy (without<br>
restrictions) or via electronic voting.<br>
<br>
On 30/09/2016 19:13, Badru Ntege wrote:<br>
> Andrew<br>
><br>
> On 30 Sep 2016, at 5:30 pm, Andrew Alston<br>
> <<a href="mailto:Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com" target="_blank">Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.c<wbr>om</a><br>
> <mailto:<a href="mailto:Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com" target="_blank">Andrew.Alston@liquidte<wbr>lecom.com</a>>> wrote:<br>
><br>
>> No Omo,<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> Please read what Ashok said – the limitation **WILL NOT SURVIVE LEGAL<br>
>> CHALLENGE**<br>
>><br>
><br>
> Afrinic is a regional organisation if we are being shackled by<br>
> jurisdiction of registration we have 52 other jurisdictions.<br>
><br>
> We have options. Let's remain very open and objective to what is best<br>
> for members.<br>
><br>
> Consensus not legal shackles is what the Internet is built on.<br>
><br>
><br>
><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> The companies act does not ALLOW the limitation.<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> Andrew<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> *From: *Omo Oaiya <<a href="mailto:Omo.Oaiya@wacren.net" target="_blank">Omo.Oaiya@wacren.net</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:Omo.Oaiya@wacren.net" target="_blank">Omo.Oaiya@wacren.net</a>>><br>
>> *Date: *Friday, 30 September 2016 at 17:29<br>
>> *To: *Andrew Alston <<a href="mailto:Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com" target="_blank">Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.c<wbr>om</a><br>
>> <mailto:<a href="mailto:Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com" target="_blank">Andrew.Alston@liquidte<wbr>lecom.com</a>>><br>
>> *Cc: *Jean-Robert Hountomey <<a href="mailto:jrhountomey@gmail.com" target="_blank">jrhountomey@gmail.com</a><br>
>> <mailto:<a href="mailto:jrhountomey@gmail.com" target="_blank">jrhountomey@gmail.com</a>><wbr>>, "<a href="mailto:community-discuss@afrinic.net" target="_blank">community-discuss@afrinic.net</a><br>
>> <mailto:<a href="mailto:community-discuss@afrinic.net" target="_blank">community-discuss@afri<wbr>nic.net</a>>" <<a href="mailto:community-discuss@afrinic.net" target="_blank">community-discuss@afrinic.net</a><br>
>> <mailto:<a href="mailto:community-discuss@afrinic.net" target="_blank">community-discuss@afri<wbr>nic.net</a>>><br>
>> *Subject: *Re: [Community-Discuss] Accountability assessment - quorum<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> As you have repeated but that is by the way. What is clear is that<br>
>> electronic voting has solved the issue with proxies so we don’t need<br>
>> them. If the companies act is restrictive and does not support better<br>
>> accountability, proxies can be limited to one per member to balance<br>
>> things out.<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> On 30 Sep 2016, at 15:22, Andrew Alston<br>
>> <<a href="mailto:Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com" target="_blank">Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.<wbr>com</a><br>
>> <mailto:<a href="mailto:Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com" target="_blank">Andrew.Alston@liquidt<wbr>elecom.com</a>>> wrote:<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> Jean-Robert because proxies are enshrined in the companies act and<br>
>> the act explicitly states that they cannot be removed irrespective<br>
>> of what a company’s bylaws / constitution says.<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> See fifth schedule section 6<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> Andrew<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> *From: *Jean-Robert Hountomey <<a href="mailto:jrhountomey@gmail.com" target="_blank">jrhountomey@gmail.com</a><br>
>> <mailto:<a href="mailto:jrhountomey@gmail.com" target="_blank">jrhountomey@gmail.com</a><wbr>>><br>
>> *Date: *Friday, 30 September 2016 at 17:22<br>
>> *To: *"<a href="mailto:community-discuss@afrinic.net" target="_blank">community-discuss@afrinic.ne<wbr>t</a><br>
>> <mailto:<a href="mailto:community-discuss@afrinic.net" target="_blank">community-discuss@afr<wbr>inic.net</a>>"<br>
>> <<a href="mailto:community-discuss@afrinic.net" target="_blank">community-discuss@afrinic.ne<wbr>t</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:community-discuss@afrinic.net" target="_blank">community-discuss@afri<wbr>nic.net</a>>><br>
>> *Subject: *Re: [Community-Discuss] Accountability assessment - quorum<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> Talking about Board Members election (1) and (2), why do we want to keep Proxies While we have Electronic voting ?<br>
>><br>
>> Proxies make sens when a member cannot attend the meeting in person, isn't what we wanted to solve with electronic voting?<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> (1) <a href="http://afrinic.net/en/community/elections/bod-election/process" target="_blank">
http://afrinic.net/en/communit<wbr>y/elections/bod-election/proce<wbr>ss</a><br>
>><br>
>> (2) <a href="http://afrinic.net/en/about/agmm/participate-vote" target="_blank">
http://afrinic.net/en/about/ag<wbr>mm/participate-vote</a><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> On 9/29/16 8:56 PM, Alan Barrett wrote:<br>
>><br>
>> On 30 Sep 2016, at 02:26, Mark Elkins <<a href="mailto:mje@posix.co.za" target="_blank">mje@posix.co.za</a>> <mailto:<a href="mailto:mje@posix.co.za" target="_blank">mje@posix.co.za</a>> wrote<br>
>><br>
>> The only time the Proxy Restrictions are enforced is for the Board<br>
>><br>
>> elections. Traditionally, the elections for the PDP Co-Chair is hands at<br>
>><br>
>> the meeting and the elections for the ASO-AC is by secret ballot by<br>
>><br>
>> those present.<br>
>><br>
>> Proxy restrictions apply to elections by the Members (Resource Members and Registered Members). ASO-AC and PDWG elections are by the community or by the PDWG, not by the Members. Board elections and now Governance Committee elections are by the
Members.<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> Alan Barrett<br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> _____________________________<wbr>__________________<br>
>><br>
>> Community-Discuss mailing list<br>
>><br>
>> <a href="mailto:Community-Discuss@afrinic.net" target="_blank">Community-Discuss@afrinic.net</a><br>
>> <mailto:<a href="mailto:Community-Discuss@afrinic.net" target="_blank">Community-Discuss@afr<wbr>inic.net</a>><br>
>><br>
>> <a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss" target="_blank">https://lists.afrinic.net/mai<wbr>lman/listinfo/community-discus<wbr>s</a><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> _____________________________<wbr>__________________<br>
>> Community-Discuss mailing list<br>
>> <a href="mailto:Community-Discuss@afrinic.net" target="_blank">Community-Discuss@afrinic.net</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:Community-Discuss@afrinic.net" target="_blank">Community-Discuss@afri<wbr>nic.net</a>><br>
>> <a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss" target="_blank">https://lists.afrinic.net/mai<wbr>lman/listinfo/community-discus<wbr>s</a><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> —<br>
>><br>
>> Omo Oaiya<br>
>> CTO/Directeur Technique, WACREN<br>
>> Mobile: <a href="tel:%2B234%20806%204522778" value="+2348064522778" target="_blank">+234 806 4522778</a>, +221 784 305 224<br>
>> Skype: kodion<br>
>> <a href="http://www.wacren.net" target="_blank">http://www.wacren.net</a><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>><br>
>> ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
>> Community-Discuss mailing list<br>
>> <a href="mailto:Community-Discuss@afrinic.net" target="_blank">Community-Discuss@afrinic.net</a> <mailto:<a href="mailto:Community-Discuss@afrinic.net" target="_blank">Community-Discuss@afri<wbr>nic.net</a>><br>
>> <a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss" target="_blank">
https://lists.afrinic.net/mail<wbr>man/listinfo/community-discuss</a><br>
><br>
><br>
> ______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
> Community-Discuss mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:Community-Discuss@afrinic.net" target="_blank">Community-Discuss@afrinic.net</a><br>
> <a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss" target="_blank">
https://lists.afrinic.net/mail<wbr>man/listinfo/community-discuss</a><br>
><br>
<br>
--<br>
Mark James ELKINS - Posix Systems - (South) Africa<br>
<a href="mailto:mje@posix.co.za" target="_blank">mje@posix.co.za</a> Tel: <a href="tel:%2B27.128070590" value="+27128070590" target="_blank"></a><a href="tel:%2B27.128070590" value="+27128070590" target="_blank">+27.128070590</a><span> </span> Cell: <a href="tel:%2B27.826010496" value="+27826010496" target="_blank"></a><a href="tel:%2B27.826010496" value="+27826010496" target="_blank">+27.826010496</a><span> </span><br>
For fast, reliable, low cost Internet in ZA: <a href="https://ftth.posix.co.za" target="_blank">
https://ftth.posix.co.za</a><br>
<br>
<br>
______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Community-Discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Community-Discuss@afrinic.net" target="_blank">Community-Discuss@afrinic.net</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss" target="_blank">https://lists.afrinic.net/mail<wbr>man/listinfo/community-discuss</a><u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"> <u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div></div></div>
</div>
</blockquote></div><br></div>
</div></div><br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Community-Discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Community-Discuss@afrinic.net" target="_blank">Community-Discuss@afrinic.net</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.afrinic.net/mail<wbr>man/listinfo/community-discuss</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div></div>
<br>______________________________<wbr>_________________<br>
Community-Discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Community-Discuss@afrinic.net">Community-Discuss@afrinic.net</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.afrinic.net/mailman/listinfo/community-discuss" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://lists.afrinic.net/<wbr>mailman/listinfo/community-<wbr>discuss</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div></div></div>